The Truth Will Set You Free

But first, it will piss you off.

I asked May last night about the etiquette of linking to opinions you wish to disagree with. His reply was “It’s the Internet. You can do whatever you’d like.”

Yea. Doesn’t that just hit the nail on the head?

john (his capitalization use, not mine) has a great blog. He’s thoughtful, he’s sincere. He and I have some differing opinions, but in general I quite enjoy reading his posts. (He also posts a lot, which is great for keeping me entertained at work.) And he reads this, so I’d like to make it very clear that I quite like him.

But yesterday he approvingly posted a quote. And when I read it and his response to it, I screamed. (Apparently, Elizabeth screamed too.)

I didn’t really get the bitterness. I yell, and I fume, but there’s always been something a bit alien to me about just how bitter May is, or why Bitchy is such a bitch. But guys, I understand now.

Here’s the quote I have a problem with:

You are the male of the future and your message is an important one. The Female Gender is the superior gender. I am not saying males are useless, they are the yin to our yang, but the best male is one who understands his role as helpmate and passive.

Funny how people toss about “superior” without owning up to its binary relationship with the word “inferior.” “Inferior” is such a nasty, tricky word.This is sexism.

Check it out, straight out of the all-knowing Wikipedia: Sexism can refer to . . . different beliefs or attitudes [such as] the belief that one gender or sex is superior to or more valuable than the other.

Many folks seem to think that sexism must necessarily go hand-in-hand with chauvinism, or misogyny, or misandry. Actually, no. Hatred is not a prerequisite for sexism. You can say you love and respect men in their inferior status, and you’re still sexist. A lack of hatred is not a mitigation.

Still others think that since culturally women have been getting the short end of the stick since god-knows-when, espousing a doctrine of female superiority isn’t sexist; it’s payback. Well, there’s a word for that too: reverse sexism. Notice how the word “sexism” still exists in that phrase.

And hey, maybe it’s just me, but I don’t happen to think sexism is okay. Neither, might I add, does the U.S. Government.

Perhaps you would like to live in a world in which we are not all created equal, or in which there are no efforts made to protect the human rights of certain groups. But this is not that world. This world is fucked up and twisted about and still suffering massively under the influence of people who believe in the superiority or inferiority of generic characteristics in their fellow human beings. One of the things you do not have, as a random Internet voice, is the authority to include me in your world view. And one thing you shouldn’t be doing is allowing philosophies that promote violations of human rights to be approved, respected, or used to represent the opinions of a larger community.

Here is how that quote could have been written in such a way that I would have no problem:

You are the male of my future and your message is an important one to me. I consider myself superior to you. I am not saying you are useless, you are the yin to my yang, but the best male you can be for me is one who understands his role as helpmate and passive.

That? If she wrote that to me, or May, we’d both still find it offensive as hell. But that’s a personal matter. Excluding generalizations makes that a personal comment, which means it’s no one’s business except the person who wrote it and the person who’s receiving it. A generalization covers more ground than you think. It covers every woman, and every man, and every space. Your method of anonymous communication via the Internet does not excuse generalizations.

In the privacy of your own home you’re welcome to say anything you like. You can say that Jews have horns, or that men are pigs, or that French people smell bad. You can say that one gender is superior to another.

But I’m here to tell you, anonymity and privacy are not the same thing. The Internet is a public forum. Which means you are espousing a public opinion. Which means you are promoting sexism in a public space. You’re just wearing a mask to do it.

Can we think of any other examples of rhetorics of group superiority being espoused from behind the supposedly untouchable comfort of anonymous masks?

Saying that you’d like to be superior/inferior to a specific man/woman in a certain context is something ya’ll can work out for yourselves. (Yes, I’m even okay with the word “superior” in certain, pre-negotiated relationships.) But the minute you generalize it to include people you don’t know, the minute you say it in a public space, you are espousing a sexist philosophy of life. You say it on the Internet as though this space exists only in a fantasy realm. As though the online world is an extension of your bedroom. Or maybe you think that speaking to a sympathetic audience excuses the offense your opinion gives to those outside your audience.

Say it in your workplace, and you’d be fired. Say it in a non-anonymous public forum, and maybe you’d get sued for your trouble. That’s the trouble with generalized philosophies of superiority; in the real world, practicing them is illegal.

Don’t delude yourself. Maybe there are fewer consequences here, but this space is not an extension of your bedroom.

Maybe you happen to think sexism is okay. Maybe you love the idea of being dominated and inferior, or dominating and superior. Y’know what? Great! Fine. Your rights are your own. Give them away, exchange them with your partner, do whatever you’d like with them.

But the second you generalize your opinion of superiority or inferiority, you include others. If you say women are superior, you include me. If you say men are inferior, you include May. You are fucking with our rights, and our status, and our place. You are spreading propaganda about us.

And you do not negotiate my rights.

Submission

Recently a very close male friend of mine who identifies as a dom came to me with an interesting proposal. “I want to submit to you,” he said. For reasons of his own, good solid reasons that I approved of after picking his brain for literally hours. But I was surprised. He’s a dom, after all. We’ve played in the past; long ago in an alternate universe we would switch off topping and bottoming to each other for exploration and catharsis. Now he and I do needle scenes together. There’s trust there.

We played earlier this week. It was a good scene; there were knives involved, and face slapping. I knew from our conversations that submission is sexually linked for him; I was a bit more sexual. It ended quietly. He spoke about where he’d gone, and what he’d felt, and I did a bit of the same, but in the end, really, I was surprised.

For me, nothing changed.

For him, that scene fit his idea and definition of submitting. But for me, it didn’t. It just was. I just was. If that’s what domination and submission means, then I dominate everyone I play with. (I have had people argue that I do dominate everyone I play with, because I am “naturally” dominant. I have no idea what that means.)

My ideas about domination and submission are changing. I wish to still accommodate differences of opinion; I realize that relationships are possible with different expectations and opinions, much in the way of the recent scene I’ve mentioned. But the idea of “submission,” for me, is going deeper. Is becoming more rarified, and more intense. More (and I hesitate to use the word, because it has horrible connotations in the scene) true.

It is for this very reason that relationships created with an established power dynamic from the very beginning wig me out. I have never in my entire life started a conversation or a relationship out with the idea that I’m the dominant partner; the thought of doing so makes me simultaneously infuriated and nauseous. I like it even less to be approached by people who immediately qualify that they are submissive. Men and women I don’t know who want to submit to me. I bet there are some of them reading this blog. I know you’re out there.

You have no idea what submission means to me. You and I are not speaking in the same vocabulary. How could we be? We just met.

Submission means different things to different people. It means different things to the same people in different contexts. It plays in shades, degrees and variations. It comes in stripes and spots and purple sprinkles. For the context of this blog post, I will attempt to explore what the hell I mean when I say that word. What I want it to mean, although I accept that I can’t always get what I want.

Submission.

I have a hard time coming to terms with my “dominant” tendencies, the part of me that demands submission. Devotion, surrender, control. There are little voices that like to whisper: you think I’m awesome? You think I’m powerful, worthy of respect? You think I’m qualified to play with your mind and your emotions?. . . Really?

It’s intoxicating, the thought that I could reach out and take that. That I could go to a club, post my photo on a list, or hell, write a craigslist ad demanding submission from strangers. Men would fall down for me. It would be so, so easy. And it makes me sick to think I’m tempted by that. Even the smallest part of me. What kind of men would they be? What kind of person would that make me?

I get that it’s hot, I get it. Power is delicious no matter what end of the spectrum you’re standing on. Oh god, dating a man who jumps when I say, strips when I say, fears me, follows me, spends the whole first date in a sweaty-palmed frenzy, I get it.

But I don’t do it. It takes so, so long for me to play that game with people. I’m frightfully bad at being dominant. Actually dominant, the way I think of dominant.

A part of submission is choosing not to fight back. choosing to support a power structure wherein I rule over you. How can you choose that, how can you support me, if you don’t know me? And if you’re smart and thoughtful and have worked long and hard coming to terms with your submissive nature, how can you then take something so valuable and just drop it in my lap?

Fuck, don’t give that to me. Don’t give that away to anyone, but least of all to me.

Do you realize that in so blithely handing your submission over to me without knowing my qualities, you have devalued all of the work I’ve done in my emotional journey to accept my dominance? I want someone who submits to me consciously, who’s worked hard and respects me because I’ve done the same.

Submission, especially well thought out, careful, loving and intelligent submission, is not a gift. I don’t just take it and play with it and own it merrily until I wear it out and send it to Goodwill. It is an exchange. Do you know what you demand of me, when you submit to me? That the more power you give me the more responsibility I have? (Secretly, I am Spiderman.)

I want you to dominate me.

Do you have any fucking clue what you’re asking?

What part of domination and submission says that the dominant’s part is easy? That we can just hand out sentence without remorse? That we can accept devotion without personal recriminations?

Maybe you think I’m an appropriate person to submit to, but more important than your opinion is my own. It’s my life, after all. Am I an appropriate person to submit to?

If being dominant is being given complete, utter, total control over another person in emotional, physical and mental aspects, how much fuckupery can be caused by one simple, stupid mistake? I hate mistakes. I hate them, but I make them. If being dominant is being asked to take responsibility, what do I do when I’m tired and don’t want it?

Submission as I want it is not giving all these powers up to me. It’s giving them up and then having the courage and intelligence to still be alive, well, and supporting me when I mess up and it all comes crumbling down.

Sometimes when I’m very, very small and sleepy I ask May questions. “Will you still love me if I don’t reach my goals?” He laughs, and he kisses me, and he says yes. He always says yes.

And I cry. I cry like a lost child, I cry because I’m terrified, because it is so fucking scary to exist in a world that demands so much. My world. My standards, my goals.

Many people who decry instant power dynamics say that submission is about trust. How can you trust someone with your submission if you don’t know them? But there’s another side to that, as there always is.

It’s not just “Do you trust me to dominate you?” It’s “Do I trust you to submit to me?” Do I trust you to catch me when I fall, comfort me when I cry, allow me the insane luxury of believing, just for a little while, that I’m as worthy and valuable a person as I want myself to be? Do I trust you to understand how hard I’ve tried and how much I want from you and from myself, and how desperately I want it?

Do I trust you to still love me if I fail?

Eureka!

I have a theory. Newly discovered. It’s a bit revolutionary, I know, but I think that if you stop and contemplate it with me, just for a little while, you will agree that it is an obvious, necessary endpoint of our biological and cultural origins. Here’s my theory:

All men are bisexual.

Women are the natural aggressor in sexual activity. We’re dominant, horny, think about sex four times a minute. Biology endows us with the ability to devour our partners. (Vagina dentata, no?) Culture confirms and validates us. Men, in their passive roles, devote themselves to attracting us. Seducing us. Worshipping us. Deep seated instinct demands our dominance as a gender. (You know, don’t you, that gender equals power?)

And as sexual aggressors, women are always wanting more. Two mouths on my body are better than one. Four hands on my skin are better than two. We’re devoted to the conquest, the chase, the sating of our pleasure in the most extravagant ways through the mouths and bodies and cocks of our willing prey.

And men are willing. Everything men do, you see, is designed to attract women. As the passive partners in the sexual act they choose to seduce us by making themselves increasingly attractive, offering us everything we desire.

Women live for sexual conquest; as many men as possible, as many possible ways. Devotion to a single partner is laughable for us, unnecessary. We’re independent, self-fulfilled. We support men. Their devotion is unquestioned, and complete.

Any man who tells a woman he’s bisexual is hoping to pick that woman up. We know, of course, that men only say they’re bisexual to get more women. The male-to-male attraction is a pale comparison to the passion and devotion that men feel for women. (Don’t give me this piffle on the definition of “bisexual.” Men love the pussy above all.)

Any man who tells a woman he’s bisexual is offering a threesome with another man. He won’t be particularly picky on who the other man is, because they’ll both be too busy devoting themselves to the woman’s pleasure. His best friend? Sure! His twin brother? Brilliant! Friendships be damned, incest is a lark, as long as the lady’s happy in the end.

Following logically from the above point, all bisexual men are also polyamorous or dedicated to open relationships. Or if not, then they’re just sluts. (And since all men are bisexual, all men are also sluts. Logical, no?)

Gay men are all secretly bisexual, just waiting for the right woman to take them in hand and show them the glory of pussy. We all just love wanking off to the thought of gay men. So sexy! Look at all the pretty men just waiting to be shown the light; they’re like pussy virgins! And god, do we love virgins.

Any man who insists that he’s straight is just shy.

And then, when it comes to sex everybody likes pretty things. Men are by far the more beautiful gender. Just look at all the pretty, pretty, pretty men. So it makes sense that men should be attracted to themselves in a purely sexual sense. It’s a matter of aesthetics.

But of course in the end all bisexual men will eventually choose long term female partners, because although men are pretty, there’s just no denyin’ that women make more valuble partners. We’re the independent ones, after all, earning a living, guiding sexual encounters, making decisions. A man couldn’t function without a woman around to support him. Eventually all bisexual men outgrown their attractions to other men and prefer to devote themselves to a single woman. Only then can they truly be happy, or experience love.

I haven’t thought, really, about women who like other women. I don’t think women can be bisexual, actually. I mean, it seems strange that a woman who could have her pick of the most attractive partners of either gender would choose to sleep with women. Didn’t we just get through saying that men more attractive? And fit logically into the necessary power structure that women deserve in their sexual encounters?

But I guess that women who like other women might secretly think of themselves as men. Then they’d only want women. So I guess all bisexual women are secretly gay. Or degenerates. I don’t really care. I’m not one of those.

As long as men can come out and just embrace that they’re all secretly bisexual, I’ll be a happy girl.

And if you have the contact information for the leaders of any overpopulated, impoverished countries, could you send it along to me? I have a killer recipe for roast baby rump in lemon herb sauce.

You mother fucking assholes.

Creation, Education, Recreation

Shameless plug! Shameless plug!

I apologize in advance for this if your geographic location makes this event inappropriate.

As I mentioned, I’m one of the organizers for The Floating World. What I may not have mentioned is that I am one of the programming organizers, and I have been working my ass off along with my fellow committee member.

What that means is that we’re in charge of the education and a good chunk of the entertainment for the event, and there are some seriously fabulous people coming to speak. People like Susan Wright, Kate Bornstein and Jack McGeorge. Go look at the list that is the result of a lot of fabulous people and a lot of hard work coming together. Like what you see? Look at all the rockin’ organizations who are involved with us.

Not only that, but we will have some wonderful play spaces. And our event has been structured to allow play, kink, sex, fire, mayhem and puppies to coexist. It took some doing, believe me.

Floating World is located in Edison, NJ, and runs the weekend of August 24th to the 26th. Registration closes on August 5th.

Let me say that again. Registration closes on August 5th. No exceptions. We have to close the event registration at that time for issues of legality. Have you registered? No? Go register!

I’m not usually one for shameless plugs, actually. I think this will be a good event. I can feel it in my chest, insistently clamoring. I’m looking forward to presenting with May, and wandering about, and existing for a short time in such a space. I like kink events and kink people. I like spaces where I can be all of myself.

Do you?

Protected: Two Things Are Infinite

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


Cloudless Climes and Starry Skies

Kink journal? What, what?

People are talking about beauty. That’s got me thinking. What a surprise, really, that something would get me thinking. Here’s where my consciousness went wandering.

I have this friend. She’s kind of a new friend, because not only am I (as previously mentioned) practically crippled at getting to know people, she is also exceedingly pretty, and exceedingly pretty people are a titchy bit tough for me. I am by far my harshest critic and can easily convince myself that such and such a person is simply too cool for me. I did this with Blaise when we first met. We laugh about it now; such a ridiculous concept, that we wouldn’t like each other.

But I’m glad I know her, because she is charming, and also kind of wonderfully smart.

She and I and a few others had a interesting conversation a bit ago, in which she mentioned that she sometimes feels uncomfortable in scene spaces because of her beauty. Other people will sometimes react negatively to her body, as though her presence is a critique upon themselves.

There’s that insidious, damaging us-versus-them mentality creeping up again. In the issue of physical beauty more than anything else, people seem to be incapable of assessing themselves on a non-comparative basis. Obviously this is because we feel that we have to be judged against some kind of standard, which is only moderately less fucked up than declaring we must be judged at all. But it’s very, very different to judge oneself against an idealist idiom with no physical manifestation and to judge oneself against a real live person, standing in front of you. You’ve drawn the other person unwittingly and unfairly into your process of judgement.

And although I found that to be rather horrendous, even I am guilty of the smaller sin of dismissing the body issues of other people. I sometimes brush off the concerns of my friends. I think I’m a bit plump ’round the edges. I lost a bunch of weight, then gained some of it back, and now bounce around from day to day. I have bad-ish skin and ugly feet. For the longest time I was convinced something was wrong with my face, with my features too small for my flesh. But I self-deprecate and other people react with incredulity, and sometimes bitterness as well. Like hell you’re fat, you’re skinnier than me! You’re not ugly, you’re beautiful, I’m the one who’s ugly. How dare you have body image issues? How dare you?

Us versus them. Me versus you. I get that the instinct to rank people according to appearance is partially biological, but we’re in the 21st century and I’d like to believe we’ve grown beyond the grunting of our lizard brains. I get that it’s deeply cultural, but I’d like to think we’re aware enough to use culture as a common language rather than a common standard.

Many people believe that confidence is directly linked to physical appearence. It seems logical that if we’d feel better if we wore a size four, then the people who already wear a size four must feel fan-fucking-tastic all the time. We make no allowances for genetics. We cut ourselves no slack.

Why don’t we have an us versus them mentality on intelligence, I wonder? People are much less likely to look at some briliant philosopher and say to themselves, “Damn, I’m so not as smart as that guy. I suck.” But young girls look at models all the time and think their lives will be over if they don’t make themelves that skinny. This is the crisis of body image. Anorexia, bulimia, plain old every day angst, the desparate need to become prettier. There are no damaging psychological or physical diseases based upon the desperate need to become smarter.

When did it come about that our culture contentedly accepts intelligence as a natural, innate gift of genetics, yet deprecates and criminalizes physical appearance as completely under a person’s control? Unfortunate if you’re stupid, lucky if you’re smart. Valuable if you’re skinny, worthless if you’re not.

Has no one caught on to the idea that you can make yourself smarter? That intelligence demands to be worked at, that it is far more insistent and just as hard and just as worth doing?

And has no one caught on that there will always be someone prettier, smarter, better on the sliding judgment scale? And that sometimes a game in which you cannot win is not a game worth playing?

I’ve no intention of writing a philosophical treatise on the advantages of Objectivism in this blog. But it has been to my advantage to allow myself the luxury of isolated judgment. To deliberately, consciously set my own standards and determine my own value. I am no less driven for trying to step outside a competitive mentality, and in fact hold myself to standards that are upon occasion ridiculous. But they’re my own. And of course I fail sometimes, and of course I judge sometimes and get occasionally bitter, but I’m always swinging back to my own definitions.

It should be noted, however, that attempting to take oneself outside of a competitive mode when dealing with one’s own value does not prevent one from evaluating others. We can’t help evaluating people; we do it unconsciously. It makes the difference between choosing our partners based on our personal inclinations and choosing them at random.

I have zero intention of claiming that I don’t hold my partners to standards. Of course I hold my partners to standards; the people I chose to involve myself with both affect and reflect my life. I won’t invite just anyone into my home or my bed.

And although it might just be politically incorrect to say so, some of my standards are mental, and some are physical. It is a very common (and I think more positive than the alternative) attitude to become frustrated with strictly physical expectations, and to as a result adhere to a strictly mental system of standards, wherein partners are judged only by their personalities, characters, and intelligence. (With the thing where bad logic is reversed again. We just love doing that, don’t we?)

In the case of my friends, mental standards are the only standards I believe are appropriate. (An advantage of the blogosphere.) I may worry that my friend Paul is rapidly pushing 350 lbs and is giving himself health problems, but he’s a genuinely terrific man whom I’m glad to have as a friend.

But when it comes to the people I sleep with, the people I play with, physical appearance is a factor. May is playful, clever, funny and devilishly smart. He is also attractive, and smells good. Would I still sleep with him if he wasn’t attractive and smelled bad? Probably; he’s pretty damned brilliant and the physical doesn’t make or break my decisions. But it helps. Of course it helps.

When it comes to physical appearance, all I really expect is an attempt at health, by whatever definition works for that person. A bit of consciousness, an acknowledgment that neither of us is contained entirely within a mental realm and our bodies don’t exist just to lug around the hardware. I don’t mind what age you are, I don’t mind how your genes arranged your facial structure. Will it help if you happen to have a body that’s artistically interesting, aesthetically balanced? Will it help if I think you’re hot as hell? Sure. Of course it will. But I like playing with people, not inflatable skins.

Because I hold myself to physical as well as mental standards, I expect a certain awareness in both aspects from my partners. I expect them to deserve me.

Watch it now. Think about what that means; no writing it off as standard femdom propaganda. I am smart, self aware, sometimes funny, mentally engaged, personally demanding, have very high goals, and am aware of my body. I’m also arrogant, neurotic, guilt-ridden, awkward, eat like crap, don’t exercise enough and am more than a little fucked up and strange. I expect my partners to deserve me.

To Sit In The Light

This isn’t a real post in any form of the word we understand over here in this universe. More a note. A line, if you will.

That beach I went to last week? Was clothing optional. And I thought at the time that y’know, it’d be fun. Maybe I’d take my top off. Any old day at the beach.
I’m here to tell you now, clothing optional beaches are the best beach experience ever. It was so decidedly not weird. Friendliest beach I’ve ever been to. Not bunches of attractive girls laying out in the sun and young guys running about looking like ants dressed in Abercrombie. No feeling awkward or fat.

It appears that clothing optional beaches are self-regulating. The people who go are going to be more open minded, less mainstream. They’ll probably have different bodies, or occasional tattoos, or feel too big or too small. (Maybe someday I’ll write about how people farther outside the mainstream definition of beauty seem more inclined to alternative spaces.) Or maybe they don’t. Get anyone naked and there’s always a little something different. So people who show up hoping to ogle, to be surrounded by beautiful naked bodies, instead show up and get a bunch of normal people, all ages, all body types, all happily naked.

Also, you will never realize what a supremely annoying garment a bathing suit is until you take it off.

Going back tomorrow. This time I will get a tan, damnit. Skin cancer be damned, wrinkles be damned. It’s a chronic condition of the human psyche to worry over things. We don’t sit in the light enough. Every year I have to re-teach myself how to lay outside, how to let the sun work in me.

Practice Before Preach

In which I become politically charged through osmosis, because passion inspires passion and I hung out with a bunch of passionate folks last night.

Everyone has heard the phrase I’m starting with today. It’s a maxim of the kink community; it’s practically gospel. Say it with me now, people:

Your kink is not my kink, but your kink is okay.

Well I’m here to tell you that as of right about now, I think when it comes to this particular maxim, the community is full of shit.

We’re actually excellent at maintaining this structure within our own groups. I hang out with people who do scat and are wigged by needles. We get along just fine. But the idea isn’t intended as a simple guideline between friends; it’s intended to be something much more powerful.

Communities concerned with sex, especially of an alternative variety, share a common interest: Sex! In some way, somehow, we’re wanking differently than our perceived conception of the norm. As such, would it not make sense for us to draw together? To support one another when brought under fire by things like abstinence-only education in American schools?

That’s not “not our problem,” by the way. I don’t particularly care what your political opinions are concerning issues that aren’t sex related, but surely you must see the trickle-down effects of the idea of abstinence-only education? Any initiative that restricts information harms us. Hell, restricting information harms everyone. It’s called censorship.

But in the meantime, the straight scene doesn’t talk to the gay scene, the gay scene doesn’t talk to the trans scene, the kink people don’t talk to the swingers, the poly people don’t talk to the sex positive people. The list goes on. We are not a cohesive unit. We are ten thousand fractured little shards all so wrapped up in making our own kinks okay that nobody stops to think that maybe, possibly, if every queer person in America spoke up at precisely the same time we’d deafen our way to acceptance.

Saying “your kink is not my kink, but your kink is okay” should be an open invitation. It should encourage more people to go cross community jumping, to reach out in ways that they wouldn’t otherwise and trust that it’ll turn out all right. I am a cross community jumper. I’m kinky and poly and bisexual too. And every time I show up at an event that’s not kink specific, I have to remind myself that the people I’m with have common interests with me, do not live under bridges and have intelligent things to say.

Maintaining insular communities is the epitome of the phrase “your kink is not okay.” Isn’t there a word for someone who does the very thing they say they don’t do? One of those long fancy words we don’t like hearing in relation with ourselves?

We, when by “we” I mean apparently everyone on the frickin’ planet, are obsessed with us-versus-them mentalities. Gay versus straight. Kinky versus vanilla. Look, if making our communities and our world better is going to be all about carving out a place for ourselves in a grandiose battle for freedom, I’m pretty sure we’re gonna lose. In case you haven’t noticed, we are currently outgunned.

The political and social issues surrounding sex have been pinned with war language, and that just wigs me the fuck out.

I’m trying very, very hard not to make this a fuzzy-wuzzy “Can’t we all just get along?” post. But seriously? Why is it that when I see what’s going on around me, instead of being content to live my life excellently and let others live their lives as they choose, I feel the need to stand up and just start shouting? We keep saying that other people, vanilla people, politicians, whatever, need to accept alternative sexualities as a community, but we suck at accepting each other. We are a laughable joke of a community.

And because we are such a joke, we damage ourselves. The premise of the community’s movement is currently one of having our differences accepted by the population at large. Although within the guidelines of us versus them this appears logical, even rational, we’re too busy not talking to each other to realize the flaw in our current argument.

If they say “You’re different, we’re not,” and we respond with “We’re different, you’re not” we have screwed ourselves. Remember the bit about how bad arguments remain bad no matter what kind of spin you try to put on it?

The idea isn’t to stand up and fight for our particular right to be different. The idea is to stand up and fight for everyone’s right to be different. The day that any person can say “Hey, I do things a little bit differently” with absolutely no fear or trepidation is the day alternative sex communities will have a secure place in the world. Not because we’ll be able to say such things; we already do that. But because everyone will be able to.

In the end, being vanilla is just another way of having sex. It’s not “normal.” Normal is pretty much a useless word. Everyone does things a little differently. The way we’re all going to live without tearing each others throats out is not just by accepting that, but by simply admitting it.
I can’t up and force people to admit that they’re different. It’s easy for us to say “Everyone is different” but very, very hard for us to say “I’m different.” It’s the us-against-them mentality all over again. I’m different. Me against the world.

Scrap the us-versus-them mentality. Your differences are not my differences, but your differences are okay. Live and let live, and every once and a while, socialize.

Protected: . . . And The Perfect Place

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


Protected: It’s The Perfect Time . . .

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below: