Submission

Recently a very close male friend of mine who identifies as a dom came to me with an interesting proposal. “I want to submit to you,” he said. For reasons of his own, good solid reasons that I approved of after picking his brain for literally hours. But I was surprised. He’s a dom, after all. We’ve played in the past; long ago in an alternate universe we would switch off topping and bottoming to each other for exploration and catharsis. Now he and I do needle scenes together. There’s trust there.

We played earlier this week. It was a good scene; there were knives involved, and face slapping. I knew from our conversations that submission is sexually linked for him; I was a bit more sexual. It ended quietly. He spoke about where he’d gone, and what he’d felt, and I did a bit of the same, but in the end, really, I was surprised.

For me, nothing changed.

For him, that scene fit his idea and definition of submitting. But for me, it didn’t. It just was. I just was. If that’s what domination and submission means, then I dominate everyone I play with. (I have had people argue that I do dominate everyone I play with, because I am “naturally” dominant. I have no idea what that means.)

My ideas about domination and submission are changing. I wish to still accommodate differences of opinion; I realize that relationships are possible with different expectations and opinions, much in the way of the recent scene I’ve mentioned. But the idea of “submission,” for me, is going deeper. Is becoming more rarified, and more intense. More (and I hesitate to use the word, because it has horrible connotations in the scene) true.

It is for this very reason that relationships created with an established power dynamic from the very beginning wig me out. I have never in my entire life started a conversation or a relationship out with the idea that I’m the dominant partner; the thought of doing so makes me simultaneously infuriated and nauseous. I like it even less to be approached by people who immediately qualify that they are submissive. Men and women I don’t know who want to submit to me. I bet there are some of them reading this blog. I know you’re out there.

You have no idea what submission means to me. You and I are not speaking in the same vocabulary. How could we be? We just met.

Submission means different things to different people. It means different things to the same people in different contexts. It plays in shades, degrees and variations. It comes in stripes and spots and purple sprinkles. For the context of this blog post, I will attempt to explore what the hell I mean when I say that word. What I want it to mean, although I accept that I can’t always get what I want.

Submission.

I have a hard time coming to terms with my “dominant” tendencies, the part of me that demands submission. Devotion, surrender, control. There are little voices that like to whisper: you think I’m awesome? You think I’m powerful, worthy of respect? You think I’m qualified to play with your mind and your emotions?. . . Really?

It’s intoxicating, the thought that I could reach out and take that. That I could go to a club, post my photo on a list, or hell, write a craigslist ad demanding submission from strangers. Men would fall down for me. It would be so, so easy. And it makes me sick to think I’m tempted by that. Even the smallest part of me. What kind of men would they be? What kind of person would that make me?

I get that it’s hot, I get it. Power is delicious no matter what end of the spectrum you’re standing on. Oh god, dating a man who jumps when I say, strips when I say, fears me, follows me, spends the whole first date in a sweaty-palmed frenzy, I get it.

But I don’t do it. It takes so, so long for me to play that game with people. I’m frightfully bad at being dominant. Actually dominant, the way I think of dominant.

A part of submission is choosing not to fight back. choosing to support a power structure wherein I rule over you. How can you choose that, how can you support me, if you don’t know me? And if you’re smart and thoughtful and have worked long and hard coming to terms with your submissive nature, how can you then take something so valuable and just drop it in my lap?

Fuck, don’t give that to me. Don’t give that away to anyone, but least of all to me.

Do you realize that in so blithely handing your submission over to me without knowing my qualities, you have devalued all of the work I’ve done in my emotional journey to accept my dominance? I want someone who submits to me consciously, who’s worked hard and respects me because I’ve done the same.

Submission, especially well thought out, careful, loving and intelligent submission, is not a gift. I don’t just take it and play with it and own it merrily until I wear it out and send it to Goodwill. It is an exchange. Do you know what you demand of me, when you submit to me? That the more power you give me the more responsibility I have? (Secretly, I am Spiderman.)

I want you to dominate me.

Do you have any fucking clue what you’re asking?

What part of domination and submission says that the dominant’s part is easy? That we can just hand out sentence without remorse? That we can accept devotion without personal recriminations?

Maybe you think I’m an appropriate person to submit to, but more important than your opinion is my own. It’s my life, after all. Am I an appropriate person to submit to?

If being dominant is being given complete, utter, total control over another person in emotional, physical and mental aspects, how much fuckupery can be caused by one simple, stupid mistake? I hate mistakes. I hate them, but I make them. If being dominant is being asked to take responsibility, what do I do when I’m tired and don’t want it?

Submission as I want it is not giving all these powers up to me. It’s giving them up and then having the courage and intelligence to still be alive, well, and supporting me when I mess up and it all comes crumbling down.

Sometimes when I’m very, very small and sleepy I ask May questions. “Will you still love me if I don’t reach my goals?” He laughs, and he kisses me, and he says yes. He always says yes.

And I cry. I cry like a lost child, I cry because I’m terrified, because it is so fucking scary to exist in a world that demands so much. My world. My standards, my goals.

Many people who decry instant power dynamics say that submission is about trust. How can you trust someone with your submission if you don’t know them? But there’s another side to that, as there always is.

It’s not just “Do you trust me to dominate you?” It’s “Do I trust you to submit to me?” Do I trust you to catch me when I fall, comfort me when I cry, allow me the insane luxury of believing, just for a little while, that I’m as worthy and valuable a person as I want myself to be? Do I trust you to understand how hard I’ve tried and how much I want from you and from myself, and how desperately I want it?

Do I trust you to still love me if I fail?

12 Comments

  1. maymay wrote:

    This reminds me a lot of what I was trying to articulate in my sex trade post. It also reminds me of the “layers” concept that I should write about, about how D/s is all on top of, and not a replacement for, a good relationship and emotional health.

    And, of course, this is why I still don’t call myself submissive to just anybody—only to you.

    Both partners, regardless of dominant or submissive tendencies, have to ask themselves, “Do I trust you to still love me if I fail?” This is not actually a power question.

    Friday, July 27, 2007 at 4:50 pm | Permalink
  2. Beeeeej wrote:

    I don’t have much to add. Except sort of yeah.

    Sometimes I like to say that being a dominant woman is like being Tantalus in Hades. Standing in a lake dying of thirst. Surrounded by a mass of everything you ever wanted - submissive men as far as the eye can see. A world of polytunity - except not. And not right.

    But it may be that I just like to think about Tantalus in Hades every chance I get.

    Friday, July 27, 2007 at 5:53 pm | Permalink
  3. tom "my preciousss" allen wrote:

    Fuck, don’t give that to me. Don’t give that away to anyone, but least of all to me.

    Oddly, I just had a sudden memory of Galadriel in LOTR (film version) checking out the ring from Frodo and then giving it back.

    Friday, July 27, 2007 at 10:02 pm | Permalink
  4. Eileen wrote:

    Tom-

    OH MY GOD! I cut a whole chunk out of this blog post about that very scene!

    Yay, I love geeks.

    Friday, July 27, 2007 at 11:28 pm | Permalink
  5. engrailed wrote:

    You have the most beautiful way of expressing your humanity … what a lovely mind. I understand what you are saying, although the burden is easily avoided by a switch. Perhaps we are cowardly, neither here nor there. Thank you for the perspective …

    Saturday, July 28, 2007 at 8:50 am | Permalink
  6. Richard wrote:

    I remember several years ago when I was looking online for someone dominant to play with (or have a relationship with - whichever).

    I kept running into these creepy characters who because they had granted themselves a title thought I should forget how to capitalize my name and just roll over.

    Any sort of negotiation or prior meeting proved that I wasn’t “real.”

    This was about the time when it was discovered that some guy who had been meeting submissive women online had murdered them all buy imprisoning them in metal drums.

    I actually pointed that out to a couple of these self-imagined dominants. But it was still surrender totally and instantly or get lost.

    Saturday, July 28, 2007 at 2:58 pm | Permalink
  7. Eileen wrote:

    May -
    Yes. Layers are good. You’re right - that’s not a power question persay. It’s simply a trust question, something that demonstrates support.

    Saturday, July 28, 2007 at 7:07 pm | Permalink
  8. Eileen wrote:

    BJ-

    Um, hot? Tantalus, not a world without polyunity.

    Engrailed-

    On the countrary, I think that switches face very unique challanges. “Cowardly” would be the last things n my mind.

    Richard-

    Goodness, that’s a scary news item. We had something similar in the paper recently about a woman from my school who was stalked and raped and then lit on fire - and survived. I didn’t talk to strangers for weeks.
    I’ve expressed myself before on the automatic demand for power. Ugh.

    Saturday, July 28, 2007 at 7:12 pm | Permalink
  9. tom allen wrote:

    I cut a whole chunk out of this blog post about that very scene!

    *nods*
    Saving the chunk for another day?

    Yay, I love geeks.

    Interestingly, just today my daughter (12 yo) said something about appreciating that I’m a cool geek-type dad. Good thing, ‘cos she’s turning into a young female version of me (much to the dismay of Mrs. Edge).
    ;-)

    Saturday, July 28, 2007 at 10:31 pm | Permalink
  10. Eileen wrote:

    Tom-

    I might save it for another day, but there are levels of geekery that I’m not sure can be fully contextualized in a blog like this. Like, the backstory of Galadriel and why that struggle is particularly hard for her in ways that the movie never tells us about. . . Yea. Geek.

    I place the blame for my geekhood on my parents, especially my dad. Star Trek: Next Gen was an evening ritual of extreme importance.

    Saturday, July 28, 2007 at 11:07 pm | Permalink
  11. tom allen wrote:

    *nods in understanding*

    I place the blame for my geekhood on my parents, especially my dad.

    No permanent damage from the parental units? So, there’s a chance that my daughter will be alright, then?

    Sunday, July 29, 2007 at 12:17 am | Permalink
  12. Ropenuts and other canards wrote:

    Have I ever mentioned i just adore you.

    That summed up much of how I feel when someone asks me to do more than just play so perfectly the realities of that dynamic and the internal quandaries.

    Ive had that question asked of me now twice over th last 2 years and its a gut wrenching a question for me each time. Why, Do you know who I am or am I just a fantasy, Why should I let you under my skin, Into my life, What if I really am not the person you think I am and many more questions both felt and unformed and written out in total clarity.

    I don’t think its in anyway particular to male or female doms but I can never understand the immediate surrender crap I see online and in the scene the two date or one date collar, the I want to submits that seem to be more interested in submitting to a whip or set of fetish clothes with out any understanding what it means to submit or that someone is in those clothes.

    If someone cant be mine just being then they really aren’t worth the time

    Sunday, September 2, 2007 at 11:29 am | Permalink

2 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. [...] said before that I have no trouble coming to terms with being a sadist. I’m not one of the dominant women for whom sadistic play is ultimately [...]

  2. Oh, RAGE « beyond the hills on Monday, October 20, 2008 at 5:01 am

    [...] let me hit him. To let me tie him up. For me to trust him to let me cut him, deny his senses, deny his pleasure, deny his [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
*
*