In one of our nude beach outings last month, a bunch of people got into a discussion about body types. This was a fairly obvious discussion to get into, surrounded as we were by naked bodies of all iterations. Eventually a theory was put forth that people automatically categorize those they see into specific body types.
The professor, who was lounging on a blanket at the time, looked at me. Simultaneously, I looked at him. We exchanged a silent nod, and then smiled.
“Yea, um,” I said. “Artists don’t actually do that.”
The professor (who teaches art) chimed in. “There’s an alternate understanding of visual relationships.” Obviously he sounded smarter. His nickname is the professor, after all.
I’m thinking about this conversation now in relation to the recent posts May and I have made about pretty men. May is a pretty man. I find him extremely attractive. But only vaguely is he “my type.” I have some generalized preferences, but in the end, I don’t have a type. And curiously, I think this kind of thinking stems directly from how art is involved with my life.
I started drawing before I can remember. I know this is so because my parents saved all my drawings for me to look at later. (Why do people do this? They saved everything. We have a whole filing cabinet full of my crayons.) But unlike most kids who can draw when they’re six but not when they’re sixteen, I didn’t grow out of drawing. I could always draw.
But then, even though I could always draw there was a specified starting point when I began to educate myself about drawing. Seven or so years ago I began taking classes. I read some books. I fought like hell to get into a drawing class as a college freshman that I would never have been allowed to take if I hadn’t been as talented as I was. The class was taught by a short dumpy man, bitter, balding, who would wear brightly colored ties and tell us stories about eating in diners with Jackson Pollock. He never uttered a word of praise in his entire class, he was vicious tearing into people’s motivations, and he could break sight into shape and line like a child hitting windows with a baseball bat. He was also a famous professor, in demand, brilliant, and had no qualms in showing it. I was a little bit in love with him.
I might have been a little bit in love with him because he was the first person to say this to me out loud: “You’re going to look at the world differently, and you’re going to do it all the time. And,” he would sometimes add, “you’re going to work to do it.”
This was the year I consciously recognized that I was redefining my visual relationships all the time. Not just in class, not just with a sketchbook in my hand. This was also the year I came out as bi. It was the year I joined the public scene. Are these things related? Bisexuality, at least, makes a lot more sense to me when beauty conveys itself in abstracts rather than gendered archetypes.
When you first start to draw, a common practice is to create an image of a face. Your face, maybe. So you draw two eyes, and a nose and a mouth, you give it some hair and ears and a line that encircles the head, and then you sit back and start thinking why the hell it looks nothing like you.
Similarly, you could draw your own body. If you’re a woman, you draw a head atop a neck, with shoulders and arms, breasts, waist, legs, feet. Again. Nothing like you.
Then you start thinking about how the pieces fit together, and the way that the creases in the skin can be echoed by your pencil on the page, and how shapes superimpose themselves.
This is the thing I learned very, very quickly as an artist: Holding a preconceived or stereotyped notion of body image is the fastest possible way to fuck up your figure drawing.
When I look at faces I see lines and shapes. I see cheekbones in relation to eyes in relation to the spacing of the forehead and the chin. When I look at bodies I see planes and angles and negative space. I see details, curves, and intersections. I find these elements more interesting, and in many cases much more attractive than specific body parts or specific adherences to aesthetic codes.
Seriously, would you like to help yourself break down the cultural imprints of stereotypical imagery in your brain? Learn to draw.
What does this mean for me? For one, it means that the people I’m attracted to look very different from one another. It means that I have never had a lover or partner I did not find aesthetic pleasure in. It feels slightly as though I’ve expanded my conscious perception of beauty as reflected in human aesthetics.
It also means that the thought processes in my head seem to work differently than those around me. I like different kinds of pornography. I point out different people on the street. I notice quirky details, and then notice myself noticing them and wonder if that’s the artist in me coming out.
5 Comments
“I might have been a little bit in love with him because he was the first person to say this to me out loud: “You’re going to look at the world differently, and you’re going to do it all the time. And,” he would sometimes add, “you’re going to work to do it.”“
I think my dad was the first person who articulated that to me, only it was in the context of breaking away the percieved disability of being bipolar.
“It also means that the thought processes in my head seem to work differently than those around me.“
I don’t draw worth shit, but I certainly understand this feeling. It’s something I think is appropriately called a mixed blessing.
sometimes i have a difficult time explaning to others that while i may find them beautiful, i dont find them attractive. or some other semantically correct wording. i find i can appreciate the way someone looks, the way someones shaped, and it differs from the forms and features that i find stimulating.
When I look at faces I see lines and shapes. I see cheekbones in relation to eyes in relation to the spacing of the forehead and the chin. When I look at bodies I see planes and angles and negative space. I see details, curves, and intersections. I find these elements more interesting, and in many cases much more attractive than specific body parts or specific adherences to aesthetic codes.
I have tried before to explain this way of seeing to people who have no experience with drawing and failed miserably. You, on the other hand, have expressed it beautifully.
May-
Good evidence of the nature of your alternate thinking can be seen in the fact that you linked the word “bipolar.”
I have long since ceased to think of bipolar disorder as being a disability. I’m not sure if I ever did think so, but then, I never had it. But I’ve told you before that I forget you have it for months at a time, even though I see evidence of your alternate thinking every day.
Perhaps it is a mixed blessing. It can be alienating. Yet, you’ve said to me before that you consider being bipolar as a gift, because it helped you to do exactly what we’re talking about.
Darkness-
See, I find beauty to be attractive. I rarely separate the two ideas. I think I used to quite a bit more, but that was before I had any sort of practice melding sexuality with my life.
Amethyst-
Why thank you. It’s easier to explain to people who already get it :).
Being involved with visual art does impart varied ways of seeing. Some may say it is related to the visual investigations that constantly take place for an artist. It often is a child-like curiosity to see, figure out, process and understand. But one could argue that this action is too sophisticated to be child-like. What it is is an openness or open mindedness to all aspects of beauty, form and aesthetics. It is seeing differently. But, we must take note that being attracted to someone and seeing someone as beautiful could be a double edged sword. It will depend on the standpoint of the viewer. Are you emotionally wrapped up and directed toward a person, therefore he/she is attractive to you or is he/she beautiful as a form? Much of this can be determined by how someone is taught to view and appreciate beauty. Has your culture had a hand in it, your education or the media and what do you connect beauty to and how do you qualify it?
Post a Comment