20. After The Tumultuous Free-Fall

In a more revealing moment, a few thoughts on penises.

I used to not really like them. I mean, I didn’t really mind the appendage, as a general rule, but neither am I one of those women intimately caught up in the mysteries of peni. Trying to work my way around being a sex-positive woman with little interest in penetration meant that I did spend a fair share of my time dodging their involvement in my sex life. And gentlemen, love you though I do, I happen to find most of you far more attractive in jeans than naked. What can I say? I’m a costumer. I like strategic clothing.

But May’s penis is swaying my opinion, and has been for some time. For one thing, it smells good. I have met some confronting smells, and some neutral ones, genitals that simply did not smell at all. I happen to think women smell nicer than men. So to find out this late in the game that the penis can smell genuinely good? That is unexpected, and gleeful.

I’m not a dirty girl. I know, I know. But I’m not. I’d rather be clean, I’d rather smell nice. I’d rather not roll around in pools of my own sweat and bodily fluid, although I will, in the heat of certain moments. And thus the real crux of my wariness. Eventually penises, big, small, rosy, smelly, clean, dirty, shaved, unshaved, eventually in our encounter they will spurt bodily fluid at me. That can be a literally amazing moment. It can be splendid, it can be tumultuous ecstatic free-fall.

But once the aftershocks wear off, I can’t help but think that semen just…smells awful. I hustle May to the shower, I laugh as he wipes the goo from his own eyes. And once he’s clean again, I let his back next to my skin.

The Pen Is The Tongue Of The Mind

I’ve joined FetLife, a curious experience simultaneously stimulating my interest in social dynamics and making me want to stab unwitting stuffed animals with forks. I should begin by saying that despite my intermittent screeching noises, it really is a good site and a sound premise, and hopefully it grows into something of a real community.

The stabbing, you ask? Ah yes. The site is simply a little microcosm of kink, and as such occasionally prompts me to sharpen forks.

The well shot, well proportioned, laughably stereotypical picture on the home page of an older, greying man holding the throat of a young, beautiful, bound woman is thankfully no longer getting under my skin, because Maymay is a computer genius. I asked him to make sure that picture never shows when I load the home page, he fiddled a bit, wrote some code doohicky, and voila. Customized log in, Eileen-annoyance free.

And since changing my orientation from “Dominant” to “Top,” I am no longer identified under a gendered abbreviation. Unless some shockingly clever person manages to push “toppe” through as the new label-du-jour, I suppose.

And I admit, I refused to friend the three young men from New South Wales who each requested foot worship sessions with me.

But these things? They are just my little nitpicks. They are not really problems, per say. Just a friendly confirmation that the quirks of our subculture are alive and kicking. And yet, I am beginning to reconsider my membership. This may be part of a massive shift in my life which has pushed my kink awareness under in favor of work and domesticity.

The thing about a microcosm of kink is that no matter how hard I try, it’s only a matter of time before something crosses my radar that just inflames me. And no, I’m not talking about the big issues here. Oh no, I’m perfectly capable of becoming inflamed over tiny things that people less prone to passionate annoyance will shrug off, or simply fail to notice.

I joined The Kinky Intellectual’s Book Club FetLife group. And as I did so, I made a tiny internal bet with myself. “What do you bet, Eileen, that this group will go three days without mentioning Kushiel’s Dart?”

“I bet nothing. I refuse to throw perfectly good money away.”

Good thing I didn’t bet. But oh, the annoyance.

As I have previously mentioned, I have read Jacqueline Carey’s Kushiel series. At the time, I was ambivalent toward them. They are not staggering works of literary genius. They are passable fantasy that occasionally wanders into “decent” territory. (Yes, you may dispute this. I have high standards. We know this by now.) I am no longer ambivalent. I feel now, toward these books, an annoyance that momentarily lingers on inflamed irrational rage.

I have had these books recommended to me on a rate of about four times a year for the past six years. I am sick of being told I should read these fucking books, so sick, in fact, that I will now sometimes, in very snippy moods, head off sentences that begin with “Have you ever read…” by interrupting, “Carey? Yes, I have.” They do not deserve this overflow of effusive praise. They are simply not that good.

The Kushiel series, along with a very few other titles that compose the core (and only) BDSM fiction reading list for those of us not inclined to get our wanks from online erotica, operate within a starvation economy that skyrockets their value far beyond anything my tastes will allow. We are so desperate for kinky material that’s been proofread and couched in narrative that we will devour, praise and pimp the passable. And since I’ve written here before about my utterly devastating erotic obsession with artistic skill, one can imagine how this makes me feel.

From here I veer off in two directions, both writerly in nature. Starvation economy of words? Duh. Create more words.

There is the little tickle in the back of my brain, the one that moans of how unfair it is that to find kink content I like I’m best off creating it myself. But that little tickle is the remenant of an indignation that has long since fizzled down; it is, after all, not unfair for me to produce content if I genuinely love producing content.

On the one hand, there is that distinct temptation: “Eileen, how about you write a nice juicy kink/fantasy crossover novel? You’d be rich! Rich, I say!” I’ve gone far enough down this road to have sketched a setting, a plot, some subplots. I’ve done character profiles, even toyed with the first few pages. I have, essentially, a half-decent, passable working novel idea. But I’m still feeling my way through fantasy genre writing, and I don’t know how I feel about writing passable novels.

And then, there is the hand that wants to write the real story down. The story that’s on this blog and all the natty details in between, all blended up in a realist half-fiction that’s more worth the time it would take to write and the time it would take to read. I want to write kink and love the way Stephen Elliot writes kink and love. I want to squash Mistress Nan off the market and completely redefine the “real experiences of a dominant woman” in all their intricate, clumsy, laughable, joyful ache and glory.

A telling insight on my ego: I desire to possess skill and desire to possess the skilled. I keep falling flat on my face for artists and writers, the body as a metaphor for the intellect, the intellect as a metaphor for the body. Or, to put it bluntly: the better I craft, the hotter I get. The better you craft, the hotter you get.

Protected: Photographic Proof

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


Ragging

My novel proceeds at a pace that would make me despair if I wasn’t musing over how to write a Wild West fairytale flashback character without channeling Clint Eastwood.

Meanwhile, I have just come off the rag, so to speak. I think that since I’ve made a habit of writing about anything that comes my way that’s related to my body, this is a fine topic for today.

I find the way that women’s periods are talked about a bit strange. There’s the usual influx of euphemisms, but I’d like to set those aside for the moment. What I find strange about mentioning that I’m on/near/capable of having my period is the look of bemused bewilderment that such a comment will usually pull out of my male friends.

I realize that it’s entirely fair for these friends of mine to feel bewildered when confronted with the mention of an experience which half the population finds alien. But then, I’m still surprised every time; menstruation is such a routine, usual part of my life.

And yet, this routine is rife with physical and mental issues. Issues I rarely talk about, or even think about, even when I’m on my period. That’s weird. I love thinking about things.

So, I think I’ll explore a little, maybe shed some insight on this bodily function that takes up one of every four weeks of my life.

Here is a breakdown of what happens to my body every month.

My period usually begins in the first week of the month, and when I was on the pill (which I was for four years) its regularity was so mind-numbingly predictable that I also knew it would come, each month, on a Wednesday afternoon. Now that I’m almost two years off the pill it is only slightly less regular. I’ve never experienced the change in cycle that can come when women who live together sync their periods up. If this happened with my mother and I, I never found out. When I lived with two of my best girlfriends, senior year, I was still on the pill. They synced to me. I was like a drumbeat.

I recently started taking more drastic steps toward getting rid of the acne that lives (lived, I hope) on my chin. I find it unfair that I have acne at the age of 24; I realize that many of us continue to have acne our entire lives, but this does not prevent me from feeling as though I’m still in middle school every time a new whitehead comes swimming up to the surface.

This acne has always behaved in predictable cycles. A week before my period it threatens, and then will usually flare up two days before I start bleeding. Since I came off birth control I’ve learned that I can predict the arrival of my period through watching my skin. Now, however, I’m two days past my period, and I have just gotten my first pimple in two weeks. This is mildly confusing to me, and I’m sure my skin is confused as well.

My period begins with a bit of dark red-brown spotting, nothing too alarming. Within four hours it increases to a steady flow, and by the middle of the next day is usually heavy enough that I’ll bleed through a heavy-duty tampon in about an hour. (That’s very quickly, by the way.) This tapers off steadily over the next three days; by the third night I will be able to sleep eight hours without having to get up to insert a new tampon. Usually my body gets a bit coy at this point and stops bleeding for about 12 hours, or just long enough for me to start thinking it might be over. Then, once I’ve let my guard down, it comes rushing back in for a day in a final hurrah.

I started using tampons when I was a freshman in high school, and they practically changed my life. I hated pads so, so much. They never worked, I would always bleed through them, and sometimes I’d end up with horrible patches of blood on the insides (or outsides) of my clothes. I avoided tampons for a while because the mechanics of them spooked me, but after borrowing one from a friend’s mother in a desperate last-ditch effort one summer day, I learned by necessity and never looked back.

My periods mean a few things to me, in both physical and mental aspects. These are the issues that continually crop up.

The first day of my period means I may be in for a very bad couple of days.

Usually my cramps are mild to moderate. They are deep belly pains, not quite like muscle pains, and they make me feel shitty. Sometimes this is literal. I described this feeling, once, as “being two steps away from having my stomach fall out of my butt.” But this cramping, although annoying, is manageable. It is uncomfortable rather than truly painful.

About once every four months, however, I have what I call a bad period. These are the periods that kick off with a little trickle of cramping pain and culminate, a day later, in sweat-soaked twisting misery. My entire lower half ties in knots, cramps that start at the middle of my spine and end in my knees. There is nausea, and a lot of blood. Since I never know just when one of my bad periods will be, when the first spotting comes I start mentally steeling myself for this possibility. Sometimes I take Advil. Usually it’s too late.

The first time this happened I was in high school. I curled up on the bed in our guest room and moaned, my arms wrapped around my waist. It was the first time I’d ever been in serious pain that wouldn’t stop or fade away. It lasted about three hours. My dad brought me saltines and told me it probably wasn’t as bad as I thought it was.

When I was on the pill these bad periods were very rare. Since I came off they’re more frequent, and much worse. The worst one was about a year ago. I called out sick that day. I remember I was curled up on my bathroom floor in an over-sized bath towel because the texture of cloth of the sheets on the bed made me feel sicker when it touched my skin. I rocked back and forth slowly and cried. In the worst of it I held my head over the toilet and vomited violently. Vomiting made the cramps fade, and I fell asleep on the floor, still wrapped in my towel.

That’s what it means to me when my period comes.

What else?

The first day of my period means I’m not pregnant.

That seems like something that I, as a woman who knows safe sex and doesn’t even have that much sex, should not have to worry about. And yet, I lived in fear of an unwanted pregnancy for a very long time. An irrational fear, but a real one. Thankfully, this has eased, because I’m better now at analyzing irrational fears.

Where I grew up, pregnancy at a young age was like a brand on your skin. It meant you had to leave school, you had smashed up your future and ruined your life. And to my family (and by extension me), “at a young age” didn’t just mean the middle school and high school years. It meant during college, after college, any time in my life before I was at least 27, and married. I got it drilled into me that anything resembling a commitment as large as a child before I had had a career and made a great deal of money would be seen as a betrayal of my genes and potential.

The very first time my first boyfriend and I slept together, the second man I’d had sex with and the seventh time I’d had sex, the condom broke. I remember his face when he pulled the little ring of latex from his penis where it had rolled itself up tight. We had been dating for six days. I was on the pill. I had missed one of my doses, the week before.

Needless to say I did not get pregnant. I simply lived in abject terror for about a week and a half, until my period came and I blessed that oozing blood flow like a fucking ceremonial cleansing rain.

I don’t think that the fear of pregnancy that I nursed for so long had much to do with the development of my kink in orgasm control, but I know that it helped me to kink on not giving out sex when I still lived with that baby stab of terror in my belly.

What else?

My period means that I’m not sexy.

Now, I don’t tend to get extremely bitchy or significantly bloated during my period, two side effects I’ve been happy to miss out on. However, my sex drive plunges. It practically free-falls. I don’t feel turned on, I usually think I look horrid, I lose interest in sex, pornography and eroticism, and I simply wait. I know that I could probably find plenty of people willing to nose-dive or cock-dive into me while bloody, but I don’t usually see the point. I find my blood interesting, especially when it’s gobby and thick, but I don’t find it sexy. That, and the nerves of my clitoris essentially shut down for a week.

But then, after my period has had its last hurrah and is permanently removed from my life for a good three weeks, my sex drive rockets upward. I become demandingly, unquenchably horny. I get in the habit of multiple orgasms, I walk around with my nipples hard, I go looking for new dirty stories to read and write. I sometimes growl during sex. It’s quite fun.

And then, after a week or so I settle back down, I get back into a groove, I don’t need sex every minute, and life goes on, until the next month comes.

And remarkably, although I’ve been doing this every month of my life for the last eleven years, I have never written any of this down before today.

Cup

Last week, for the first time in my adult life, I spent seven days without a bra.

I’ve worn a bra every day since I was 13. I remember my first bra; a white cotton thing, more of an abbreviated tank top than an undergarment. At the time I had no breasts to speak of. I simply wanted a bra. I was adamant, I insisted on being bought that silly white thing.

Since then I have fleshed up, filled out. I will never claim that my breasts are spectacular; they are, in fact, overwhelmingly ordinary. They fall from my chest outward, small against the breadth of my shoulders and the generosity of my thighs.

My breasts are not high, nor are they perky. Rather, they are long, hanging from my chest in soft U-shaped drapes with the nipples almost directly downward. They fold over my ribs, giving me creases of soft flesh in the center of my chest, one a finger higher than the other. This gives my cleavage the impression of being slightly mismatched.

In size, my breasts are a soft handful, larger than apples, smaller than melons. Perhaps a grapefruit apiece. I straddle the no-where land between bra sizes, a B cup in some brands, a C in others. Their skin is ever so pale, gleaming with the iridescent rivulets of stretch marks. After a summer in bikinis and on nude beaches my breasts have gone from white-on-white to cream-on-pink. My nipples are only slightly darker, light pink with yellow undertones and a tight, tiny splash of rose in the center. I’ve seen nipples ranging in color from chocolaty brown spots to wounds of brilliant red. My nipples are not so dramatic.

The oddest thing about my breasts, which has kept me from plumping my cleavage high in corsets and convinced me to forever avoid demi-cup bras, are their distinctively large aureoles. It’s as though the aureoles continued to grow on, leaving my breasts behind, or as though I inherited my mother’s nipples but not the double-D breasts to balance them out. I’m not going to stick a ruler down my shirt at the moment, but at a quick glance I would estimate that my aureoles are each just under four inches in diameter. This used to embarrass me. Now it amuses me. These wide circles of puffy skin are just one of the quirks of my body I’ve grown enough to like.

I’m not particularly fond of my breasts. I have definitely run the gambit of issues, flaws, bits of myself I want to cover or poke at or cut off. My breasts are not an exception, with their teardrop shape and insistently large circles. But then, nor do they particularly trouble me. They are a sort of blank spot on my body’s radar, neither sculpted nor slack. My sexual wiring lingers in my nipples momentarily, and a hand will often stray to my breasts during masturbation, kneading softly. Having my nipples played with, sucked or licked, however, is usually a tease. Not teasing in a good way; teasing similar to a fly I want to swat.

I have never had any really good bras. I’ve owned a few nice ones, with bits of lace here and there. These are few and far between, however, and I’m usually content with a simple foam cup, an underwire , some skinny straps. The gentlemen in the audience may or may not appreciate how much good bras cost; I cannot drop $60 on a garment that no one actually sees. I don’t see bras as a lingerie item, and in scenes and sex they usually end up crumpled on the floor under my jeans.

I have always had a vague longing for the fruity dips and curves of high-placed, rounded cleavage. My sexual interest in women is often prey to a bit of breast fixation. That’s right; I’m a breast woman. Supposedly expensive bras can plump me, fill me, perk me and round me all at once, but I’ve yet to lay down money for the test drive and am content with my less-than-mythic decolletage.

Because I have a penchant for plunging button-down necklines my bras are often formed with great dips in the center, the cups sometimes held tenuously together by thin bits of string. This isn’t ideal for my breasts; in fact, I would say that my taste in clothing is in direct opposition to supportive, well shaped bras. I think one must have exceptionally high-placed breasts to comfortably wear a plunging V-shaped bra; my breasts are always wandering off in strange directions like unruly children.

And yet, although I’m clearly not on great terms with my bras, I continued to wear them. To not wear them had never occurred to me. Wearing a bra raises my breasts from their typical relaxed swing-low to a level that mimics the placement of a perky set. It shifts my nipples upward, low-beams turned to high-beams.

And then, with my breasts already sagging downward I lived with a tiny twist of terror in my stomach, the thought that someday my breasts would sag so low they’d end up level with my elbows. Characteristic of my imagination, they sagged down and down until I could imagine myself a white-haired hunchback with my breasts knocking at my knees. In a high-toned and perky culture my breasts can only hope to steadily decline.

I read an article last weekend questioning the myths surrounding bras. (Unfortunately while at work I cannot pull the link from the adult blog I found the article at. I will post it from a contained environment later this evening.) The prevention of the dreaded sag was front and center; the article argued that not only do we have zero proof that wearing a bra will prevent the breasts from sagging, but doing so for one’s entire life might encourage one’s breasts in a downward direction because the muscles of the chest wall never learn to support the breasts.

Huh, I thought. That actually makes quite a lot of sense.

I mean, what do we think happened to women’s breasts before we all started wearing bras? I doubt they grew significantly saggier. Yet there’s this image that unrestrained breasts will eventually drip down the chest like molasses and end up tangled in our feet.

The article then went into back pain, shoulder pain, bad fitting bras and the woes thereof. A ridiculously high percentage of the American population wear bras that are simply the wrong size. I’m guilty of this; my ideal bra size is hard to find. I also have chronic back pain; I carry a cramped muscle halfway down my spine that has not seen a relaxed moment since I was a freshman in college. I remain open to any back rub or suggestion that might unwind that damned Gordian knot.

Why am I wearing a bra every damn day of my life? Modesty? I admit that my experiment in bralessness had revealed that about half of my shirts are translucent in nature, but I am frankly not that kind of modest. Is the modesty to do with motion? Free from a bra my breasts wobble and shake. However, if wobbling and shaking are issues I might look into getting a girdle for my generous ass before casting aspersions elsewhere.

If not modesty, then I turn my eye to aesthetics. To perk or not to perk. Haul up the grapefruits on my chest a few inches and I’m that much closer to a beautiful woman.

Back pain and sagging tits. Bound flesh and conformed image. This is what bras might be doing for me? Adventurous spirit firmly in hand, I resolved to go a week without bras. I realize that in doing this I call up many feminist and social themes. That was not my intent; my intent was to survive with a minimum of madness.

Day one was irritating, as my nipples rubbed fabric with more attention than they’d had in weeks.

Day two the pain set in; my breasts were free-hanging, sore, and cranky.

Day three I struggled at my closet, trying to find something to cover the sheer revelation of aureole peeking through the white linen of my favorite shirt.

Day four in the morning hurt the most. My nipples throbbed, a tiny constant ache. By that afternoon they’d calmed a bit, but that day it was windy and frigid outside, and I remembered the warmth of that extra fabric layer with fondness.

Day five I almost threw in the towel; I put a synthetic, scratchy shirt on in the morning without thinking, and the irritation almost crippled me. That evening I changed to a low-necked sundress and self consciously kept glancing downward at my mismatched cleavage.

Day six was the first morning I pulled a shirt on without the odd sensation of missing a step. With a clinging tank top in place I felt both self conscious and sexy, the lines of my back uninterrupted for the first time in years. My nipples were insistently cold, as though my body couldn’t pump enough blood to their surface. They clamored for their cozy foamy cups.

Day seven I regretted my linen shirt again. I put myself in profile before my bedroom’s full length mirror and watched my breasts rise and fall with my breathing.

Without a bra my breasts are no longer a blank spot on my body’s radar. They shift, they move, they critique my shirt fabric and make themselves known. The discomfort of pinched underwire and shoulder straps fades to be replaced by sensitive tipped skin and the odd feeling of hard nipples all the time. It’s a curious mix and an uncertain trade-off; the discomfort I know compared with the discomfort I’m only just learning. The entire week I felt as though I was perched on the invisible edge of understanding something I couldn’t define.

The experiment ended this morning.

I am not wearing a bra today.

Charcoal Willow Sticks

In one of our nude beach outings last month, a bunch of people got into a discussion about body types. This was a fairly obvious discussion to get into, surrounded as we were by naked bodies of all iterations. Eventually a theory was put forth that people automatically categorize those they see into specific body types.

The professor, who was lounging on a blanket at the time, looked at me. Simultaneously, I looked at him. We exchanged a silent nod, and then smiled.

“Yea, um,” I said. “Artists don’t actually do that.”

The professor (who teaches art) chimed in. “There’s an alternate understanding of visual relationships.” Obviously he sounded smarter. His nickname is the professor, after all.

I’m thinking about this conversation now in relation to the recent posts May and I have made about pretty men. May is a pretty man. I find him extremely attractive. But only vaguely is he “my type.” I have some generalized preferences, but in the end, I don’t have a type. And curiously, I think this kind of thinking stems directly from how art is involved with my life.

I started drawing before I can remember. I know this is so because my parents saved all my drawings for me to look at later. (Why do people do this? They saved everything. We have a whole filing cabinet full of my crayons.) But unlike most kids who can draw when they’re six but not when they’re sixteen, I didn’t grow out of drawing. I could always draw.

But then, even though I could always draw there was a specified starting point when I began to educate myself about drawing. Seven or so years ago I began taking classes. I read some books. I fought like hell to get into a drawing class as a college freshman that I would never have been allowed to take if I hadn’t been as talented as I was. The class was taught by a short dumpy man, bitter, balding, who would wear brightly colored ties and tell us stories about eating in diners with Jackson Pollock. He never uttered a word of praise in his entire class, he was vicious tearing into people’s motivations, and he could break sight into shape and line like a child hitting windows with a baseball bat. He was also a famous professor, in demand, brilliant, and had no qualms in showing it. I was a little bit in love with him.

I might have been a little bit in love with him because he was the first person to say this to me out loud: “You’re going to look at the world differently, and you’re going to do it all the time. And,” he would sometimes add, “you’re going to work to do it.”

This was the year I consciously recognized that I was redefining my visual relationships all the time. Not just in class, not just with a sketchbook in my hand. This was also the year I came out as bi. It was the year I joined the public scene. Are these things related? Bisexuality, at least, makes a lot more sense to me when beauty conveys itself in abstracts rather than gendered archetypes.

When you first start to draw, a common practice is to create an image of a face. Your face, maybe. So you draw two eyes, and a nose and a mouth, you give it some hair and ears and a line that encircles the head, and then you sit back and start thinking why the hell it looks nothing like you.

Similarly, you could draw your own body. If you’re a woman, you draw a head atop a neck, with shoulders and arms, breasts, waist, legs, feet. Again. Nothing like you.

Then you start thinking about how the pieces fit together, and the way that the creases in the skin can be echoed by your pencil on the page, and how shapes superimpose themselves.

This is the thing I learned very, very quickly as an artist: Holding a preconceived or stereotyped notion of body image is the fastest possible way to fuck up your figure drawing.

When I look at faces I see lines and shapes. I see cheekbones in relation to eyes in relation to the spacing of the forehead and the chin. When I look at bodies I see planes and angles and negative space. I see details, curves, and intersections. I find these elements more interesting, and in many cases much more attractive than specific body parts or specific adherences to aesthetic codes.

Seriously, would you like to help yourself break down the cultural imprints of stereotypical imagery in your brain? Learn to draw.

What does this mean for me? For one, it means that the people I’m attracted to look very different from one another. It means that I have never had a lover or partner I did not find aesthetic pleasure in. It feels slightly as though I’ve expanded my conscious perception of beauty as reflected in human aesthetics.

It also means that the thought processes in my head seem to work differently than those around me. I like different kinds of pornography. I point out different people on the street. I notice quirky details, and then notice myself noticing them and wonder if that’s the artist in me coming out.

Pleasing By Delicacy Or Grace

This post is for the pretty men.

Now, when I say pretty, I don’t mean broad shoulders, rippling muscles, carrying power tools and towering over me. I don’t mean that genre of men, though god knows I’m a fan. I am a happy member of the cheering section.

I mean the men with soft skin, full lips, femme clothing. Men with skinny limbs and long hair. Men who like to wear satin and velvet. Men who like to feel pretty.

Pretty (adjective): pleasing by delicacy or grace.

You know who you are. This one’s for you.

There is some serious fuckupery concerning how body image issues are presented. Take a minute and think about who talks about body image. Think about the last time you had a discussion about body image. Think about the language you used.

Nine times out of ten, I’d bet that language was gendered. I’d bet you were talking to a woman. Woman’s issues. Woman’s weight. Women’s bodies. We’re teaching women how to accept cultural stereotypes, and how to fight them. Women’s body issues are vocalized.

Does it not seem a little fucked up that men’s body issues are not? When body image is considered a women’s only issue, we continue to strengthen the idea that only women are judged by their bodies. In a twisted kind of way, we continue to objectify ourselves while we fight not to be objectified. Following from this, we pigeonhole men into the role of the objectifier while simultaneously ignoring them as possible victims of cultural stereotypes.

Men are praised for their attractiveness in totally different ways. They are held to totally different, strictly gendered, strictly masculine standards. These standards, by the way, are almost never standards of beauty. They’re standards of wealth, of skill, of strength, of ownership and possession. May’s attraction is judged by how hot his girlfriend is. Most people look at me. Only rarely do they look at him.

Even the uprise of the metrosexual fashion movement in urban areas perpetuates the dichotomy separating modes of attraction. Metrosexual men can be in touch with their feminine side, can “reject macho stereotypes”, can use expensive hair care products and wear aesthetically pleasing clothes. But god help them if they decide to wear a satin nightie to bed.

This blindness leaves a vast, gaping hole that pretty men keep falling down.

Men aren’t the attracting partner. Men don’t get pursued. Men aren’t androgynous. Men aren’t bisexual. Men don’t want to be pretty. Men don’t want what women have. The most damaging of all? Shut up and take it. Be a man.

Ladies, hate to break it to you. Our bodies are pushed and shoved and stereotyped to within an inch of our lives. And yet, the freedom we’re allowed in breaking gendered stereotypes of attraction is epic, compared with our fellow men.

Why are we so much more okay with women in men’s clothing than we are with men in women’s clothing? I wear boy-cut jeans and a ratty button-down, and I don’t get a second glance, and I’m not necessarily a lesbian. But May wears girl-cut jeans and a ringer tee that I gave him, and he gets looks on the street, and he must be gay. Never mind he’s holding hands with a chick.

We bitch and yell when men want to dress up as women to be humiliated. (I bitch and yell with the best of them.) What about the men who’ve been told, over and over, that a man who wants to be a woman is supposed to feel humiliated?

What about men who just want to be pretty in the only way they’ve been taught is possible: by being more like women?

There is no middle space where “real men” can feel pretty. If you’re a man who wears women’s clothing or makeup, either you’re gay, you’re just getting off on being humiliated like a weak woman, or you’re three steps away from a gender transition and you just haven’t gotten there yet. And it’s such bullshit.

There needs to be some gender fluidity, and it needs to flow both ways.

If a woman opens up and says she’s feeling unattractive in comparison with cultural standards, the common mode is to support her in a sensitive, relatively ungendered way. We’ll talk about her mind, or her ideas. But if a man opens up and says he feels unattractive in comparison with cultural standards, we tell him he’s strong. Bad logic, damnit, bad logic!

But never mind. A real man would never say that in the first place.

Posterius Maymayeus

“I shall write an ode to your bum!” I proclaimed one night. (I was drinking hot toddies; it came out a bit like “Ishil ritanode toyer BUM!”)

May looked at me, an adorable mixture of bemusement and self consciousness. “Uh huh, sweetie. That would be weird, but you write whatever you want. Maybe you should sit down?”

What is there to say about May’s bum?

I call it a bum quite consciously. It has none of the adolescent sniggering of a butt; only a smattering of the gritty sex appeal of an ass. It is rounded, very soft, and exceedingly cute. It is a bum if ever I saw one.

When I first met him, May did not have a bum at all. I remember one of the first nights he spent in my bed. I lifted his bum in the air with two fingers hooked into his pubic bone on either side, and as his legs spread wantonly open I remember his perineum bulging outward, prominently displayed against the flatness of his inner thighs. He was achingly skinny, achingly aroused.

I didn’t think about his bum, then. I had never had a partner with a particularly pert ass, and had yet to understand the appeal.

Of course, as the relationship progressed I began fattening him up. All very subtle, of course. When I met him you could count his ribs with his hands at his sides, and his jawbone was etched in stone. Once his mother, his incredibly Jewish mother, commented on this. I agreed, thusly: “Yes, the boy looks like a Ho- . . . like a famine victim.” Behind her back May and his brother choked on their orange juice to keep from laughing. Hello, my name is Awkward, could I stay a while?

My campaign to put meat on his bones rests mostly with the siren call of the Milky Way bar. Maymay cannot resist this combination of chocolaty, nougaty goodness. He’s very particular; regular Milky Way bars are ideal for munching. Popable Milky Way candies are summarily rejected (wrong chocolate to nougat ratio) while dark chocolate Milky Ways are reserved for special occasions. And king sized? Look out, world.

I hid them in my purse. I slipped them in my pockets and sent him hunting for them. I would ask him in drugstores, “Do you want a Milky Way?” He’d say “Noooo, they’re so bad for me!” and I’d smile, and buy it anyway.

And then one day he slipped on his first pair of tight-fitting jeans, turned in a pert little circle, and there it was. The bum.

May’s body is for the most part skinny, with muscular limbs and a triangular torso. His bum is round, soft, and just a bit on the squishy side. When he lays on his stomach it protrudes like a pillow. I carry my fat in my hips and my thighs; May carries his entirely in his posterior. I am shaped like a pear. He’s shaped like a porn star. Adorable little bastard.

From pictures you may or may not have seen, you might know that May’s skin is about the color of a polar bear in a blizzard. He’s covered in the posterior regions with a fine little coat of very small, very blond hairs. Slap a hand to his ass, fingers spread, and the handprint lingers on. If you do it hard enough, it can stay for hours.

Maymay is also (just a little bit, slightly all the time) anal retentive about personal cleanliness. We won’t talk bathroom habits in this particular entry, but suffice it to say I have never met such a well-soaped anus in my life. It even smells lovely. Skin and Old Spice and vanilla ice cream; this is the smell of May’s bum on warm evenings in bed. I like to bite his flesh, tongue it, roll it around in my mouth. It makes him pout when I bite his bum. Oh, I just can’t get enough.

And because I am on a calculated, tactical campaign to impress May with the reality of his sexual attraction; I pay a lot of attention to this part of him. A day does not go by when I do not grab his bum in some public setting or caress it in privacy. When I met him Maymay could not stand to be hit in that region of his body; spanking would drive him into a blind rage. I systematically destroyed this response. In this more than any other place, his attitude to spanking, I admit a deliberate, manipulative hand.

And then, there came the wiggle.

One day, pressed close against each other in bed, he made a little animal noise, combined with a tiny movement of his rear. It was not quite a shiver, not quite a wriggle. It was a wiggle. I was almost incapacitated by the cuteness of this gesture.

He kept doing it. Soon he was doing it at parties, on the subway, everywhere. It became how he said hello, how he said goodbye, how he said I love you. All of this contained in the wiggling of his bum. It got a soundtrack, an accompanying “wiggelzeebums” type of word. We joked that if he were ever made into a Super Mario Smash Brothers character, the bum wiggle would be his attack move.

His bum has become a character in our relationship. It has its own language, its own habits. It is a plump little inside joke.

Sometimes when May is tripping about the apartment, wagging that naked bum of his at the neighbors and dragging his long boned feet, I stop, and sit back, and watch him. This makes him self-conscious; he will stand pigeon-toed and wave at me. Sometimes I will stop him in the kitchen while I’m sitting at the table, pull him close and plant lines of kisses down his protruding hipbone, take little nips out of his skin and cup my hands around him.

He’ll stand for this for a minute or two, usually. Sometimes we get into little tug-of-wars. He’ll want to go back to fixing dinner, and I’ll be rapidly forgetting food in the luxurious, distracting swell of his skin.

Cloudless Climes and Starry Skies

Kink journal? What, what?

People are talking about beauty. That’s got me thinking. What a surprise, really, that something would get me thinking. Here’s where my consciousness went wandering.

I have this friend. She’s kind of a new friend, because not only am I (as previously mentioned) practically crippled at getting to know people, she is also exceedingly pretty, and exceedingly pretty people are a titchy bit tough for me. I am by far my harshest critic and can easily convince myself that such and such a person is simply too cool for me. I did this with Blaise when we first met. We laugh about it now; such a ridiculous concept, that we wouldn’t like each other.

But I’m glad I know her, because she is charming, and also kind of wonderfully smart.

She and I and a few others had a interesting conversation a bit ago, in which she mentioned that she sometimes feels uncomfortable in scene spaces because of her beauty. Other people will sometimes react negatively to her body, as though her presence is a critique upon themselves.

There’s that insidious, damaging us-versus-them mentality creeping up again. In the issue of physical beauty more than anything else, people seem to be incapable of assessing themselves on a non-comparative basis. Obviously this is because we feel that we have to be judged against some kind of standard, which is only moderately less fucked up than declaring we must be judged at all. But it’s very, very different to judge oneself against an idealist idiom with no physical manifestation and to judge oneself against a real live person, standing in front of you. You’ve drawn the other person unwittingly and unfairly into your process of judgement.

And although I found that to be rather horrendous, even I am guilty of the smaller sin of dismissing the body issues of other people. I sometimes brush off the concerns of my friends. I think I’m a bit plump ’round the edges. I lost a bunch of weight, then gained some of it back, and now bounce around from day to day. I have bad-ish skin and ugly feet. For the longest time I was convinced something was wrong with my face, with my features too small for my flesh. But I self-deprecate and other people react with incredulity, and sometimes bitterness as well. Like hell you’re fat, you’re skinnier than me! You’re not ugly, you’re beautiful, I’m the one who’s ugly. How dare you have body image issues? How dare you?

Us versus them. Me versus you. I get that the instinct to rank people according to appearance is partially biological, but we’re in the 21st century and I’d like to believe we’ve grown beyond the grunting of our lizard brains. I get that it’s deeply cultural, but I’d like to think we’re aware enough to use culture as a common language rather than a common standard.

Many people believe that confidence is directly linked to physical appearence. It seems logical that if we’d feel better if we wore a size four, then the people who already wear a size four must feel fan-fucking-tastic all the time. We make no allowances for genetics. We cut ourselves no slack.

Why don’t we have an us versus them mentality on intelligence, I wonder? People are much less likely to look at some briliant philosopher and say to themselves, “Damn, I’m so not as smart as that guy. I suck.” But young girls look at models all the time and think their lives will be over if they don’t make themelves that skinny. This is the crisis of body image. Anorexia, bulimia, plain old every day angst, the desparate need to become prettier. There are no damaging psychological or physical diseases based upon the desperate need to become smarter.

When did it come about that our culture contentedly accepts intelligence as a natural, innate gift of genetics, yet deprecates and criminalizes physical appearance as completely under a person’s control? Unfortunate if you’re stupid, lucky if you’re smart. Valuable if you’re skinny, worthless if you’re not.

Has no one caught on to the idea that you can make yourself smarter? That intelligence demands to be worked at, that it is far more insistent and just as hard and just as worth doing?

And has no one caught on that there will always be someone prettier, smarter, better on the sliding judgment scale? And that sometimes a game in which you cannot win is not a game worth playing?

I’ve no intention of writing a philosophical treatise on the advantages of Objectivism in this blog. But it has been to my advantage to allow myself the luxury of isolated judgment. To deliberately, consciously set my own standards and determine my own value. I am no less driven for trying to step outside a competitive mentality, and in fact hold myself to standards that are upon occasion ridiculous. But they’re my own. And of course I fail sometimes, and of course I judge sometimes and get occasionally bitter, but I’m always swinging back to my own definitions.

It should be noted, however, that attempting to take oneself outside of a competitive mode when dealing with one’s own value does not prevent one from evaluating others. We can’t help evaluating people; we do it unconsciously. It makes the difference between choosing our partners based on our personal inclinations and choosing them at random.

I have zero intention of claiming that I don’t hold my partners to standards. Of course I hold my partners to standards; the people I chose to involve myself with both affect and reflect my life. I won’t invite just anyone into my home or my bed.

And although it might just be politically incorrect to say so, some of my standards are mental, and some are physical. It is a very common (and I think more positive than the alternative) attitude to become frustrated with strictly physical expectations, and to as a result adhere to a strictly mental system of standards, wherein partners are judged only by their personalities, characters, and intelligence. (With the thing where bad logic is reversed again. We just love doing that, don’t we?)

In the case of my friends, mental standards are the only standards I believe are appropriate. (An advantage of the blogosphere.) I may worry that my friend Paul is rapidly pushing 350 lbs and is giving himself health problems, but he’s a genuinely terrific man whom I’m glad to have as a friend.

But when it comes to the people I sleep with, the people I play with, physical appearance is a factor. May is playful, clever, funny and devilishly smart. He is also attractive, and smells good. Would I still sleep with him if he wasn’t attractive and smelled bad? Probably; he’s pretty damned brilliant and the physical doesn’t make or break my decisions. But it helps. Of course it helps.

When it comes to physical appearance, all I really expect is an attempt at health, by whatever definition works for that person. A bit of consciousness, an acknowledgment that neither of us is contained entirely within a mental realm and our bodies don’t exist just to lug around the hardware. I don’t mind what age you are, I don’t mind how your genes arranged your facial structure. Will it help if you happen to have a body that’s artistically interesting, aesthetically balanced? Will it help if I think you’re hot as hell? Sure. Of course it will. But I like playing with people, not inflatable skins.

Because I hold myself to physical as well as mental standards, I expect a certain awareness in both aspects from my partners. I expect them to deserve me.

Watch it now. Think about what that means; no writing it off as standard femdom propaganda. I am smart, self aware, sometimes funny, mentally engaged, personally demanding, have very high goals, and am aware of my body. I’m also arrogant, neurotic, guilt-ridden, awkward, eat like crap, don’t exercise enough and am more than a little fucked up and strange. I expect my partners to deserve me.

To Sit In The Light

This isn’t a real post in any form of the word we understand over here in this universe. More a note. A line, if you will.

That beach I went to last week? Was clothing optional. And I thought at the time that y’know, it’d be fun. Maybe I’d take my top off. Any old day at the beach.
I’m here to tell you now, clothing optional beaches are the best beach experience ever. It was so decidedly not weird. Friendliest beach I’ve ever been to. Not bunches of attractive girls laying out in the sun and young guys running about looking like ants dressed in Abercrombie. No feeling awkward or fat.

It appears that clothing optional beaches are self-regulating. The people who go are going to be more open minded, less mainstream. They’ll probably have different bodies, or occasional tattoos, or feel too big or too small. (Maybe someday I’ll write about how people farther outside the mainstream definition of beauty seem more inclined to alternative spaces.) Or maybe they don’t. Get anyone naked and there’s always a little something different. So people who show up hoping to ogle, to be surrounded by beautiful naked bodies, instead show up and get a bunch of normal people, all ages, all body types, all happily naked.

Also, you will never realize what a supremely annoying garment a bathing suit is until you take it off.

Going back tomorrow. This time I will get a tan, damnit. Skin cancer be damned, wrinkles be damned. It’s a chronic condition of the human psyche to worry over things. We don’t sit in the light enough. Every year I have to re-teach myself how to lay outside, how to let the sun work in me.