30. Wood, Leather, Hemp, Stone

I’m caught in a bit of a curious no-man’s-land, at the moment.

On the one hand, I love jewelry. If I wore a single different piece of jewelry each day, I’ve estimated that it would take me a little more than a year to go through my entire collection. And I make jewelry. I’ve made about half of my collection. I love the colors. I love the spark. I am, as previously harped upon, obsessive compulsive creative.

On the other hand, I’m currently exploring the much more butch side of performativity. And I love it too, right down to my toes, to the tips of my cuffs, I love it. But there is almost no intersection between that kind of performative dress, and my brightly colored mounds of jewels. So I’ve been making new things, and running up against new questions. How is men’s jewelry different from femme jewelry different from butch jewelry? Is it different at all? Google is no help, of course. Someone must have asked this question before me.

I’ve been doing new work in wood, and in hemp and in leather. I’m still trying to figure out if I can make pearls butch. Believe it or not, I think I can.

I have images in my head of what femme is starting to mean to me, what butch is starting to mean. More and more I find that it’s the mix I like more than the far reaches of either image. All juxtapositions and inherent contradictions, as broad as my legs sprawled out in a skirt, as small as a beaded tie.

I feel like I’ve tossed a coin in the air, and I don’t know which side it’s going to come down on. In the end, I suspect, it won’t come down at all.

8. Hellfire at Maxxx Black

Hmm. Missed a day. Beer and spanking will do that to a person.

A few Mondays ago I was invited to an evening at a prominent sex-toy retail store in Newtown, Sydney’s newest young queer neighborhood. While there I heard one of the organizers of Hellfire speak. To give context, Hellfire appears to be the most visible fetish party in Sydney; everyone I meet asks me if I’ve been yet, and what I think. I usually respond that I haven’t been, because I can’t afford the door fee right now (I’m trying to stick to a $20/day budget) and were I to go it would probably have to be without my partner, because Hellfire sounds like a dance club and Maymay is not a dancer. Also, Hellfire has a dress code, and while some nights I can roll up in black without a second thought, dress codes are simply not our style.

With this in mind, after she finished speaking I raised my hand to ask a question. “You said that you have a dress code to encourage people to dress sexily, and therefore feel freer in a sexual environment. My question is,” and here I tapped my fingers on my kneecap, “what if the kind of dress I think is sexy is not the kind of dress that will pass through your dress code?”

A year ago I would have felt a little guilty for hitting her with that in such a confrontational tone. Now I’m far more invested in the answer. She talked around the question a little, and then graciously suggested that if I have a particular fetish I want to indulge, that I should email her before the next event and she would arrange something at the door. I thanked her, and I may do that. But I have my doubts; I still don’t think they’d let me in.

2. Women’s Spaces

I’ve been feeling my way around my relationship with women’s spaces and my attraction to women lately. I recently took part in a 6-week discussion group at ACON, a great queer resource here in Sydney. It was the first time in my life I had identified primarily as same-sex attracted, instead of primarily kinky.

The group was a good experience. As I’ve said before, I often have to feel my way around relationships with women very carefully. Curiously, the strongest conclusion I’ve come to from being a part of the group is that I’m increasingly comfortable with being just a bit gender queer.

I wear ties these days and don’t have to reach up and adjust them every five minutes. My hair is in my eyes and I dress like a schoolboy. Sometimes May presses his body into me, I wrap my arms around his slender waist tightly, and we kiss with his head tilted backward while I stand straight and strong. I love it. It makes me feel romantic and powerful.

The other thing conclusions I’ve reached is that I really want a girlfriend. I hadn’t expected that. I don’t know how to handle that desire just yet.

Cup

Last week, for the first time in my adult life, I spent seven days without a bra.

I’ve worn a bra every day since I was 13. I remember my first bra; a white cotton thing, more of an abbreviated tank top than an undergarment. At the time I had no breasts to speak of. I simply wanted a bra. I was adamant, I insisted on being bought that silly white thing.

Since then I have fleshed up, filled out. I will never claim that my breasts are spectacular; they are, in fact, overwhelmingly ordinary. They fall from my chest outward, small against the breadth of my shoulders and the generosity of my thighs.

My breasts are not high, nor are they perky. Rather, they are long, hanging from my chest in soft U-shaped drapes with the nipples almost directly downward. They fold over my ribs, giving me creases of soft flesh in the center of my chest, one a finger higher than the other. This gives my cleavage the impression of being slightly mismatched.

In size, my breasts are a soft handful, larger than apples, smaller than melons. Perhaps a grapefruit apiece. I straddle the no-where land between bra sizes, a B cup in some brands, a C in others. Their skin is ever so pale, gleaming with the iridescent rivulets of stretch marks. After a summer in bikinis and on nude beaches my breasts have gone from white-on-white to cream-on-pink. My nipples are only slightly darker, light pink with yellow undertones and a tight, tiny splash of rose in the center. I’ve seen nipples ranging in color from chocolaty brown spots to wounds of brilliant red. My nipples are not so dramatic.

The oddest thing about my breasts, which has kept me from plumping my cleavage high in corsets and convinced me to forever avoid demi-cup bras, are their distinctively large aureoles. It’s as though the aureoles continued to grow on, leaving my breasts behind, or as though I inherited my mother’s nipples but not the double-D breasts to balance them out. I’m not going to stick a ruler down my shirt at the moment, but at a quick glance I would estimate that my aureoles are each just under four inches in diameter. This used to embarrass me. Now it amuses me. These wide circles of puffy skin are just one of the quirks of my body I’ve grown enough to like.

I’m not particularly fond of my breasts. I have definitely run the gambit of issues, flaws, bits of myself I want to cover or poke at or cut off. My breasts are not an exception, with their teardrop shape and insistently large circles. But then, nor do they particularly trouble me. They are a sort of blank spot on my body’s radar, neither sculpted nor slack. My sexual wiring lingers in my nipples momentarily, and a hand will often stray to my breasts during masturbation, kneading softly. Having my nipples played with, sucked or licked, however, is usually a tease. Not teasing in a good way; teasing similar to a fly I want to swat.

I have never had any really good bras. I’ve owned a few nice ones, with bits of lace here and there. These are few and far between, however, and I’m usually content with a simple foam cup, an underwire , some skinny straps. The gentlemen in the audience may or may not appreciate how much good bras cost; I cannot drop $60 on a garment that no one actually sees. I don’t see bras as a lingerie item, and in scenes and sex they usually end up crumpled on the floor under my jeans.

I have always had a vague longing for the fruity dips and curves of high-placed, rounded cleavage. My sexual interest in women is often prey to a bit of breast fixation. That’s right; I’m a breast woman. Supposedly expensive bras can plump me, fill me, perk me and round me all at once, but I’ve yet to lay down money for the test drive and am content with my less-than-mythic decolletage.

Because I have a penchant for plunging button-down necklines my bras are often formed with great dips in the center, the cups sometimes held tenuously together by thin bits of string. This isn’t ideal for my breasts; in fact, I would say that my taste in clothing is in direct opposition to supportive, well shaped bras. I think one must have exceptionally high-placed breasts to comfortably wear a plunging V-shaped bra; my breasts are always wandering off in strange directions like unruly children.

And yet, although I’m clearly not on great terms with my bras, I continued to wear them. To not wear them had never occurred to me. Wearing a bra raises my breasts from their typical relaxed swing-low to a level that mimics the placement of a perky set. It shifts my nipples upward, low-beams turned to high-beams.

And then, with my breasts already sagging downward I lived with a tiny twist of terror in my stomach, the thought that someday my breasts would sag so low they’d end up level with my elbows. Characteristic of my imagination, they sagged down and down until I could imagine myself a white-haired hunchback with my breasts knocking at my knees. In a high-toned and perky culture my breasts can only hope to steadily decline.

I read an article last weekend questioning the myths surrounding bras. (Unfortunately while at work I cannot pull the link from the adult blog I found the article at. I will post it from a contained environment later this evening.) The prevention of the dreaded sag was front and center; the article argued that not only do we have zero proof that wearing a bra will prevent the breasts from sagging, but doing so for one’s entire life might encourage one’s breasts in a downward direction because the muscles of the chest wall never learn to support the breasts.

Huh, I thought. That actually makes quite a lot of sense.

I mean, what do we think happened to women’s breasts before we all started wearing bras? I doubt they grew significantly saggier. Yet there’s this image that unrestrained breasts will eventually drip down the chest like molasses and end up tangled in our feet.

The article then went into back pain, shoulder pain, bad fitting bras and the woes thereof. A ridiculously high percentage of the American population wear bras that are simply the wrong size. I’m guilty of this; my ideal bra size is hard to find. I also have chronic back pain; I carry a cramped muscle halfway down my spine that has not seen a relaxed moment since I was a freshman in college. I remain open to any back rub or suggestion that might unwind that damned Gordian knot.

Why am I wearing a bra every damn day of my life? Modesty? I admit that my experiment in bralessness had revealed that about half of my shirts are translucent in nature, but I am frankly not that kind of modest. Is the modesty to do with motion? Free from a bra my breasts wobble and shake. However, if wobbling and shaking are issues I might look into getting a girdle for my generous ass before casting aspersions elsewhere.

If not modesty, then I turn my eye to aesthetics. To perk or not to perk. Haul up the grapefruits on my chest a few inches and I’m that much closer to a beautiful woman.

Back pain and sagging tits. Bound flesh and conformed image. This is what bras might be doing for me? Adventurous spirit firmly in hand, I resolved to go a week without bras. I realize that in doing this I call up many feminist and social themes. That was not my intent; my intent was to survive with a minimum of madness.

Day one was irritating, as my nipples rubbed fabric with more attention than they’d had in weeks.

Day two the pain set in; my breasts were free-hanging, sore, and cranky.

Day three I struggled at my closet, trying to find something to cover the sheer revelation of aureole peeking through the white linen of my favorite shirt.

Day four in the morning hurt the most. My nipples throbbed, a tiny constant ache. By that afternoon they’d calmed a bit, but that day it was windy and frigid outside, and I remembered the warmth of that extra fabric layer with fondness.

Day five I almost threw in the towel; I put a synthetic, scratchy shirt on in the morning without thinking, and the irritation almost crippled me. That evening I changed to a low-necked sundress and self consciously kept glancing downward at my mismatched cleavage.

Day six was the first morning I pulled a shirt on without the odd sensation of missing a step. With a clinging tank top in place I felt both self conscious and sexy, the lines of my back uninterrupted for the first time in years. My nipples were insistently cold, as though my body couldn’t pump enough blood to their surface. They clamored for their cozy foamy cups.

Day seven I regretted my linen shirt again. I put myself in profile before my bedroom’s full length mirror and watched my breasts rise and fall with my breathing.

Without a bra my breasts are no longer a blank spot on my body’s radar. They shift, they move, they critique my shirt fabric and make themselves known. The discomfort of pinched underwire and shoulder straps fades to be replaced by sensitive tipped skin and the odd feeling of hard nipples all the time. It’s a curious mix and an uncertain trade-off; the discomfort I know compared with the discomfort I’m only just learning. The entire week I felt as though I was perched on the invisible edge of understanding something I couldn’t define.

The experiment ended this morning.

I am not wearing a bra today.

The Most Subversive Post I Have Ever Written

So. It seems to me that outlaw cultures benefit from having the power to speak to and influence more mainstream cultures, said influence then being our defense against attack and our method of creating a space for ourselves.

It seems to me that a group of powerless people people cannot expect to have their rights defended solely from outside sources. Unfortunately, Superman does not fly around the globe defending sexual freedom, although I have to say I’d love to see it if he did.

It seems to me that power comes when people listen.

Why do people listen?

Seriously. Think about that. Who do you listen to? Why do you listen to them? I don’t mean to use the word to imply just hearing another person’s words and then responding, using them as a springboard for your own thoughts. I mean the people you take the time to understand when they present a viewpoint that is not your own.

Who do I listen to? I listen to people I respect. Why do I listen to them? Because they’ve proven to me in the past that they deserve my respect.

Logical problem. Redefine the question: why do I start listening?

I start listening to people I find interesting, or who I see as potentially having characteristics I value. I like people who are articulate, smart, excited. Funny. Wise. I like people who talk about things I care about. Everybody’s got a different list of reasons they might start listening.

It seems to me that commonly (not always, but commonly) I listen to people who are similar to me. It seems to me that most of us do this.

So if I, for example, wanted to say something to people who are incredibly unlike me, how would I get them to start listening?

Why else do I start listening? Well, I start listening to people who already hold some kind of power. Academics come to mind. It seems to me that this is common practice as well. We give more power to the powerful.

Beauty is a kind of power; more attention is paid to beautiful people. Money is a kind of power; more attention is paid to the rich. Mainstream education is a kind of power; more attention is paid to the educated.

Yes, of course it sucks. In fact, that right there might be most of the reason our world is fucked over. A self-perpetuating cycle of power based on class, wherein class is defined by values that we do not agree with.

Eileen, what the hell are you talking about?

You know what sparked this weirdly rambling thought process? Susan Wright, media spokesperson for sexual rights, wore a suit jacket to Floating World, a situation potentially involving the press. That’s it. That’s all it was.

I wrote that I like blogging because it partially protects me from agism. I wrote that I like wearing business clothes because I get better service in stores. What this boils down to is that I like being able to control my appearance because it allows me to affect my own power. I have this one particular way to expand and contract my cultural footprint, the space I take up, the influence I have on others.

(That’s right, sorry. This post is going to end up being about fashion.)

At the beginning of Pirates of Silicon Valley, Steve Jobs is trying to get a bank loan. He goes to a bunch of different banks in grubby clothes and long hair, repeatedly failing to get his loan until the day he gets a haircut and wears a suit. Banks don’t like long hair.

As much as it sucks to say it, if I dyed my hair bright blue and started wearing my leather jacket everywhere I went, my mainstream cultural footprint would shrink. This gets handled differently by different people; most members of outlaw cultures choose to say, “Fuck it, lookism is bullshit and I have a right to wear what I want and be respected.” Which is true. Which is why sometimes I do wear my leather jacket, and maybe I will dye my hair blue.

In theory I should have just as much power no matter how I look, because in theory emphatic gestures sweeping aside stupid opinions work perfectly. But practically applied, emphatic gestures just keep failing me.

What I look like says something about me. Maybe it shouldn’t, but it does. “Don’t judge a book by its cover” is still a proverb because people are still doing it.

If I know I get more respect in a suit jacket, even if I think the reasons behind why the respect is being accorded are false and damaging to my community, do I wear the jacket?

Do I reject culture or subvert culture?

Pleasing By Delicacy Or Grace

This post is for the pretty men.

Now, when I say pretty, I don’t mean broad shoulders, rippling muscles, carrying power tools and towering over me. I don’t mean that genre of men, though god knows I’m a fan. I am a happy member of the cheering section.

I mean the men with soft skin, full lips, femme clothing. Men with skinny limbs and long hair. Men who like to wear satin and velvet. Men who like to feel pretty.

Pretty (adjective): pleasing by delicacy or grace.

You know who you are. This one’s for you.

There is some serious fuckupery concerning how body image issues are presented. Take a minute and think about who talks about body image. Think about the last time you had a discussion about body image. Think about the language you used.

Nine times out of ten, I’d bet that language was gendered. I’d bet you were talking to a woman. Woman’s issues. Woman’s weight. Women’s bodies. We’re teaching women how to accept cultural stereotypes, and how to fight them. Women’s body issues are vocalized.

Does it not seem a little fucked up that men’s body issues are not? When body image is considered a women’s only issue, we continue to strengthen the idea that only women are judged by their bodies. In a twisted kind of way, we continue to objectify ourselves while we fight not to be objectified. Following from this, we pigeonhole men into the role of the objectifier while simultaneously ignoring them as possible victims of cultural stereotypes.

Men are praised for their attractiveness in totally different ways. They are held to totally different, strictly gendered, strictly masculine standards. These standards, by the way, are almost never standards of beauty. They’re standards of wealth, of skill, of strength, of ownership and possession. May’s attraction is judged by how hot his girlfriend is. Most people look at me. Only rarely do they look at him.

Even the uprise of the metrosexual fashion movement in urban areas perpetuates the dichotomy separating modes of attraction. Metrosexual men can be in touch with their feminine side, can “reject macho stereotypes”, can use expensive hair care products and wear aesthetically pleasing clothes. But god help them if they decide to wear a satin nightie to bed.

This blindness leaves a vast, gaping hole that pretty men keep falling down.

Men aren’t the attracting partner. Men don’t get pursued. Men aren’t androgynous. Men aren’t bisexual. Men don’t want to be pretty. Men don’t want what women have. The most damaging of all? Shut up and take it. Be a man.

Ladies, hate to break it to you. Our bodies are pushed and shoved and stereotyped to within an inch of our lives. And yet, the freedom we’re allowed in breaking gendered stereotypes of attraction is epic, compared with our fellow men.

Why are we so much more okay with women in men’s clothing than we are with men in women’s clothing? I wear boy-cut jeans and a ratty button-down, and I don’t get a second glance, and I’m not necessarily a lesbian. But May wears girl-cut jeans and a ringer tee that I gave him, and he gets looks on the street, and he must be gay. Never mind he’s holding hands with a chick.

We bitch and yell when men want to dress up as women to be humiliated. (I bitch and yell with the best of them.) What about the men who’ve been told, over and over, that a man who wants to be a woman is supposed to feel humiliated?

What about men who just want to be pretty in the only way they’ve been taught is possible: by being more like women?

There is no middle space where “real men” can feel pretty. If you’re a man who wears women’s clothing or makeup, either you’re gay, you’re just getting off on being humiliated like a weak woman, or you’re three steps away from a gender transition and you just haven’t gotten there yet. And it’s such bullshit.

There needs to be some gender fluidity, and it needs to flow both ways.

If a woman opens up and says she’s feeling unattractive in comparison with cultural standards, the common mode is to support her in a sensitive, relatively ungendered way. We’ll talk about her mind, or her ideas. But if a man opens up and says he feels unattractive in comparison with cultural standards, we tell him he’s strong. Bad logic, damnit, bad logic!

But never mind. A real man would never say that in the first place.

Paint It Black

Two posts in two hours? What what?
Elizabeth wrote about teal. What a great color. So brilliantly calm. Almost aggressively serene, really, like pictures of terra cotta terraces overlooking the Mediterranean Sea.

I have a very conscious, very sensualist relationship with color. I am an oil painter; I grew up saturated with the modernist art movement (generally post-Manet, pre-Malevich) and have spent entire years of my life with paint under my fingernails.

I moved to New York, and one of the very first things I decided was that I would never drink coffee, and I would never wear black. Oh, the precious laughable idealism. I grew up in a little New England town, and I wanted to stay connected with that, as though somehow my heritage was all wrapped up in my actions instead of my memories.

Six years later, and I drank two cups of coffee and an espresso shot today. Almost my entire wardrobe is black and white. I’m struggling now to change this. (Not the coffee part. I love me some good strong coffee.) But I’m working to bring color back to my life.

What happened, of course, was that I did a little growing up, and a lot of theatre tech, and I started hanging out in the scene. And I realized that I look fabulous in both black and white, because they both possess the inexplicable quality of being simultaneously effortless and dramatic. Simple. Stunning. Then three years ago, along came a suspicion that not only did black and white suit me, but business clothes as well. My style, which had always tended to a thick mix of eccentric art student crossed with clean-cut yuppie, started going more clean cut. I kept my studded belts, my enormous collection of jewelry, but started wearing blazers. Then buttondowns, then slacks. In blacks, and whites. All of a sudden I looked at myself in the mirror one day and realized I could pass for 30-something on Wall Street.

I had completed a peculiar mental separation of connecting bright colors with youth and muted colors with maturity.

People are always thinking I’m older than I am. My scene friend Rob spent the first three years of our friendship convinced that I was approximately 28, despite also being an undergrad. Age is an enormous defining factor in how the world reacts to a person. I get treated differently when I dress in a black blazer and slacks, and I’m convinced that it’s because I look older. I get better service in restaurants, politer staff in retail stores. I get interest and attraction from completely different sources.

The thing is, contentment in age works both ways. I don’t want to spend the rest of my life representing altered tastes and maturity levels because of how the world might treat me. Young people rush desperately to grow ourselves up until the moment we overshoot and all of a sudden it’s all the same anxiety reversed, trying to preserve a youthful face that we forgot to appreciate.

So rather than destroy the mental separation I created, I’m working around it. I’m 24 years old, and damnit, I will act and dress my age. I want to get past the use of clothing and color to signify maturity, and convey myself through action, speech, and intention. (Any wonder why I like blogging?)

Predictably enough, this makes my scene clothing curious. I had forgotten how obsessed the scene was with black. I forgot about the dress code because I always fit it. I forgot that scene members tend to treat people wearing color like tourists. What, vanilla people have a monopoly on blue dresses and green cords? I think I missed that memo.

The thing is, people like big, easy markers. And people like to feel as though they fit in. If every single person in a community subconsciously accepts a prescribed color scheme, eventually the scheme becomes a dress code. It’s easier to feel comfortable in a room of people with questionable tastes if all the people are wearing obvious signifiers. Black. Leather. Yes, we’re all freaks here. Don’t worry, you’re safe.

Please. Worry. Dress codes, subconscious or not, encourage conformity and close-minded atmospheres. Our tastes can afford neither.

For me, colors have personal implications, and often mentally illustrate portions of my life. The color black is all mixed up with dark spaces and maturity and elegance and diamonds and leather. It is intimately connected with the traditional scene.

Blues, especially buzzing brilliant blues like cobalt, pthalo and aquamarine are all over my memories of growing up, of open spaces, Cadillac Mountain and the Atlantic Ocean. Bar Harbor. Eric Hopkins. Blueberry ice cream.

Slice fire-engine red into the blue, and that’s my family. Lobsters on blue willow china.

Lay mild pear green and antique gold side by side, and that’s every geeky subculture I’ve ever gone exploring in. That’s me in a petticoat and a corset at a Renaissance fair, sitting on thin fall grass, drinking gold hard cider.

I want to mix these spaces up, make new connections, allow new ways of thinking about values and shades and tones. I want to wear my peach silk dress to the club, and wear my black leather vest at work. I want new relationships in my paintings, new ways of exploring the sensual, heady nuances of color.

Accept No Substitutes

I’m going to the beach today! Hurray, beaches! Maybe when I get back I will have some hilarious stories about how sand is a great scene tool, or something. So, in the spirit of frivolous day trips, here’s a frivolous entry that I wrote yesterday and didn’t post because I figured to let the computer come down a bit. It was getting hot from the typing.

(Okay, so maybe possibly this is one of four blog posts I currently have written but haven’t posted yet. Did I mention the thing where I’m apparently really good at my job, and still spend all my time writing? But I figured to let you guys rest too.)

I’m kind of fashion obsessed, which in the scene is often code for “I have a lot of black shiny things” but in the context of me actually means exactly what it says. I’m kind of fashion obsessed. I passionately love to people-watch for good and bad trends, I can spend hours debating fabric textures, I design my own clothes. I like how shape and color can modify and accentuate the body. I like that when people wear clothes they adore, for whatever reason, it makes them glow just a little bit.

And I also overthink. And you may not have realized this, but the way you dress can and will convey things about your orientation to the world. I’m smart enough and have enough short skirts to know that being read by your cover is pure fuckupery, but here’s a couple of quick, totally selfish points to make it easier for you in my world. If, you know, you’d like to come visiting.

This is by no means a complete guide; there are plenty of those already. Bitchy wrote one, but I’m too lazy to search her archives at the moment. And also, beach.

Jumping right in -
Everyone:
- Could you stop being obsessed with purple? I ask this strictly as a personal favor. I really hate the color purple. If you like it, hey, awesome, but I get pissed when all the sex toys I could possibly buy come in my least favorite color.

Women:
- Any kind of shoe with a cutesy little strap around the ankle makes you look like a sub. Those little straps are the vanilla man’s ankle cuffs.

- Chokers and short necklaces look submissive, because they recall collars. Also, collars look submissive, which should be fucking obvious but that doesn’t seem to stop prodommes from wearing them.

- You can wear a skirt as a dom. You can even wear a fwooshy, swishy skirt; go for it. But if you’d like to really just nail the issue of dominance home (like if you’re going to a club with a lot of assholes) wear pants. It just saves time.

- I don’t care if it’s not a scene look, but just for me, trash your wedges. For serious. You look like you have chopping blocks strapped to your feet.

Guys:
- Careful with the fall tones. I get that your deep purple (ugh) shirt makes you feel sexy, but you do actually run the danger of looking like a carbon copy of every other dom in the joint. (Other men have caught on to the sexy wonder that is buttondowns.) And although dark colors can be rich and yummy, they’re bloody hard to see under dim lights. You might as well be wearing black at that point.

- Wear more kilts.

- This is the big one. This might possibly be my personal fashion crusade.

Do you own anything that can be described by the three adjectives “black,” “denim,” and “tapered?” Unless what you’re describing is a black denim motorcycle jacket with a tapered waist, take it out of your closet and throw it away. Better yet, just to make sure you don’t rescue it when my back is turned, burn the fucking thing.

Tapered black denim jeans do not make you look sexy. They make you look like a serial killer with an 80s fetish.

Seriously, what’s wrong with black slacks? Black dockers? Black khakis? Or blue jeans? Blue is a lovely color.

Do you think I’m just playing around with you? Do you realize that hipsters in New York Effin’ City wear black tapered jeans ironically, because they’re so ugly? Did you catch that? Those jeans that you think are the end-all-be-all of sexy fun time are being worn mockingly by people my age because they’re just that fucking ugly.

Please. Stop. You’re making my eyes hurt.

And after you’ve cleaned your closet, come to the beach with me.