2. Women’s Spaces

I’ve been feeling my way around my relationship with women’s spaces and my attraction to women lately. I recently took part in a 6-week discussion group at ACON, a great queer resource here in Sydney. It was the first time in my life I had identified primarily as same-sex attracted, instead of primarily kinky.

The group was a good experience. As I’ve said before, I often have to feel my way around relationships with women very carefully. Curiously, the strongest conclusion I’ve come to from being a part of the group is that I’m increasingly comfortable with being just a bit gender queer.

I wear ties these days and don’t have to reach up and adjust them every five minutes. My hair is in my eyes and I dress like a schoolboy. Sometimes May presses his body into me, I wrap my arms around his slender waist tightly, and we kiss with his head tilted backward while I stand straight and strong. I love it. It makes me feel romantic and powerful.

The other thing conclusions I’ve reached is that I really want a girlfriend. I hadn’t expected that. I don’t know how to handle that desire just yet.

Protected: Photographic Proof

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


In Which We Are Geeks

Maymay has written his side of this particular thought process. Of course he is brilliant and wonderful and cute, and makes equally good points. This is highly recommended reading.

All right. We’re going to take a break from the four words to examine this idea of bisexuality versus pansexuality a little more intently. May and I have just had a very long discussion, and you all know how we like to break apart words and ideas in this space.

I wrote in my previous post that I had made a distinction between bisexuality and pansexuality. In doing so, I was reacting to a growing unease with the implications of the word “bisexual” as well as the increasing evidence that I am attracted to trans and androgynous people, people who readily mix my ideas of men and women both physically and idealistically.

We did not exactly have a discussion. We had what amounted to a fight. Here is our geekiness revealed; we fight about words. In reflection, this doesn’t actually seem so odd, or so geeky. Lots of people fight about words.

In Maymay’s ideal world, every word we use has a precise, specific, singular definition. I do not live in this world. Almost every discussion we have in this relationship in some way breaks down to a contention over the definition or usage of words. Our personalities conflict, similar to our reading tastes. May reads non-fiction, I read fiction. May’s bookshelf is full of technical manuals. Mine is full of 19th century adventure novels.

Briefly and approximately: the prefix “hetero-” means “different.” The prefix “homo-” means “the same.” the prefix “bi-” means “two.” The prefix “pan-” means “all.”

May is bipolar. He drew a comparison between being bipolar and being bisexual. Being bipolar does not mean he is always either depressed or manic. It means he exists on a sliding scale between those two states. Bisexuality, therefore, would be defined as being sexually attracted to people who fall within a range along the sliding scale of gender fluidity.

This is commonly how the word is understood in kink and alternative sexuality communities. It’s how I used the word for years. It works for this idea; in fact, it’s how most of us assume the word is used. We’ve culturally subtexted it to indicate either a sliding scale or a disregard for gender or sex. It works to claim bisexual as an identity in alternative cultures; chances are you’re not so different from me.

Used in this way, “bisexuality” obfuscates “pansexuality” by essentially making the two synonyms. “Pansexual” then becomes confusing: “Wasn’t that what I said the first time around?” we wonder aloud.

But then, I start looking at the definitions that pop up when I go searching for “bisexual.” I start thinking about how my vanilla mother interprets the word when I use it. I think about the fuckuppery that the scene goes through by unconsciously accepting rigid gender binaries.

So when I say the word “bisexual” do the people who hear me think about my tastes as two sides of a coin or as a fluid range? And if they do think of my tastes as two sides of a coin, then clearly I’ve started the conversation at the wrong entry point. So is it better to start a conversation with a word and implication I don’t like, or with a word that’s unfamiliar and relatively undefined?

Clearly, the word “pansexual” (along with words created in similar contexts such as “omnisexual”) is a neologism. In relation to the commonly known “bisexual” it has relatively little meaning or cultural clout. What does that mean? I will not claim that neologisms are valueless through their very unfamiliarity. Neologisms seem an appropriate way of promoting or defining a relatively unfamiliar idea.

And the idea of gender fluidity? For the culture we live in today, I’d say that gets a prime place on the list of unfamiliar, scary ideas.

“Pansexual” is also a political idea with roots in different issues than “bisexual.” It links to a different culture. It has different implications. It resonates with people of different interests and thought processes. And from my experience, I like those people. And I like bisexual people too.

I also recognize that people commonly try to tout pansexuality as “better” than bisexuality. Similarly, people tout polyamoury as “better” than monogamy. Just as a personal favor to me, please don’t do that.

The crux of the matter is why we use the words we do. Why do certain words define our identities; what do we claim, and how do we think? What do the words we chose say about our identity politics? Some women chose the word lesbian, while others prefer dyke. Some men claim the word fag, others choose to describe themselves as queer. May fights for words to be used in their exact sense. I do not. I like that words have ambiguities and cultural connotations. I like that labels are an entry point for learning.

May argues that if we want to get people thinking about the fluidity of gender, the best method lies in talking about gender as a scale. I argued that the best method would be to use different words, understanding that my sexuality relates to the genders and sexes I find attractive. In my experience, words create awareness.

We ended our spat about words with a deal. He’ll promote gender fluidity through conversations about scales, and I’ll promote gender fluidity through the use of different vocabulary. And in the end, we’ll probably meet in the middle.

Pansexual

Imagine you get 350 people who have consistently hidden, ignored or marginalized a similar, crucial part of their lives. Then imagine you’ve put these 350 people in an enormous space together for three days, given them power, and let them play.

Floating World was not a culture shock. Floating World was a culture validation. An absolute, no questions asked validation, warm as a big gooey oven, warm as my hands deep inside a gorgeous girl. I come out of the weekend, back to the shock treatment of database software and street meat lunches, with four words to claim. Four words that I have made and will make my own.

The first word is pansexual.

Pansexuality is a sexual orientation characterized by the potential for aesthetic attraction, romantic love and/or sexual desire for people regardless of their gender identity or biological sex.”

I was walking down the hall of the convention center, 6pm on Saturday night, and Jen and Blaise were cuddling by a wall. I had just gotten out of a panel I was speaking on about labels. I had mentioned briefly that I was struggling with the identity of bisexual versus the identity of pansexual; in essence, caught between the two words with no visceral understanding of either one.

I popped up to them, put my chin on Jen’s shoulder, grinned. It was mid-event; I was already high and climbing.

“Do you want to do a fisting tonight?” Blaise asked me.

“Who’s getting fisted?”

“This one,” Blaise smiled as he pulled Jen closer to him, “has requested a group fisting. So far it’s Tyler, me, Corey, Calico, you, and May. And I asked Kate Bornstein and Barbara Carellas too.” Jen was turning a ripe peach color.

I grinned wider. “What time?”

Jen is one beautiful half of a remarkable couple. Tyler is the other half, and she is smaller, but no less beautiful. It took me ages to recognize their kind of beauty. It is full of softness and permeated with sexuality and humor. They laugh when they’re fucking. They giggle and tell jokes and seem to have sex as naturally as I breathe.

That night we gathered in the corner of the mixed gender space, a wide curtained room off the main dungeon. We pulled a futon up to a sex swing in the corner, and made piles of bodies while Jen settled herself in the swing, her dress around her waist, leather boots in the air. Tyler was gathering lube and paper towels. “Okay guys, we’re going in order of hand size,” she said. She leaned over Jen’s body and they whispered together while on the futon we pressed palms together, comparing the lengths of our fingers and the thickness of our palms.

The cluster of people stayed on the futon while Tyler went first, making little theatrical motions in the air that sent us into hysterics. But soon, as Jen’s breathing became louder and more regular, we gathered closer. Jen is mesmerizing; we were all drawn into the magnetism of her skin. She pulled her top down, flung her arms over her head, and closed her eyes. I knelt beside the swing and grazed my lips along her neck. “Hi,” I said. “Hey you,” she answered back.

We changed places slowly, tapping out as each person drew their hands into her. Everyone in the group wanted to touch her; I would pull her hardened nipple into my mouth and smell the bootblack on Blaise’s hands as he caressed her from the other side of the swing. When we weren’t touching her, we stood close and watched.

“I’m trying to practice your breathing techniques,” she said to Barbara at one point, drawing her breath in deliberately through small moans. That got a general laugh from the sex-drugged peanut gallery.

My hands are small. When my turn was coming up I pulled on rubber gloves, dropped lube over my hands and began rubbing it to warm it into a soapy mess. As I took my place at the foot of the swing, I watched Calico pull her hand out and marveled that it had gone in so easily. Clearly in the world of penetration I am tightly lagging behind my fellow explorers. “So Jen, dear, should I mention that I’ve never fisted a girl before?” I smiled at her, fighting down the little bite of apprehension.

Jen’s pussy, as she lay with her boots sprawled upwards, was wide and slippery soft, that peach color all over again. I eased three fingers inside her, pushed a little, and jumped as my hand slid past her labia and was enveloped.

Her pussy was hot; I was reminded of fever kisses. I pushed deeper and marveled as my wrist bone touched her ass. Blaise and Tyler started giving me directions, making turns and twists in the air that I would mimic inside Jen’s body. Jen was vibrating with every motion by now, fingers grasping into Tyler’s sides and her throat all thrown back and trembling.

I piled more lube on my palms, cupped one hand around the base of the other and slid back in. With a hand and a half inside her I went exploring slowly. I couldn’t pound away, leaving that to more experienced hands than mine. Instead I made deep thrusts. I watched her body. I poured myself into her. Fucking hell, I was thinking. I want immortalize you. I want to to carve you in white marble like a goddess and paint you all in pink.

When I drew out she let out a little kitten moan and then swelled up again as Blaise’s hands replaced my own.

As I looked around the circle magnetized to Jen’s presence, I was struck, shot, paralyzed with wonder. Half the dozen-odd faces were people I’d never met before that morning. I felt a little shy when Kate turned to me and smiled; its seems that Kate is like that, at first. Barbara too. These people have so much passion it’s hard to process.

I was paralyzed so suddenly because everything was so fucking easy.

The space was easy, the people friends already. The sex was gorgeous. When Jen screamed the second time, gushing outward in a frenzy of relaxed tension, that was easy too. Easy, sexy, gratifying, and perfect.

Once Jen had struggled her liquid bones up from the swing and was standing in just her boots by the futon, I took the time to collapse and look at her. Christ, girl, you look amazing naked. I wish we could stay here forever.

The next morning in a class on male bisexuality Jefferson asked the class for a show of hands of people who identified as bisexual. I started to put my hand up, and stopped. I was thinking about the night before.

I didn’t want that space divided by gender. The “bi” in “bisexual” wouldn’t touch even half the people that stood in that circle. Do I use language for what I am or what I do? And are they different, in the end?

I raised my hand. “Can I make a distinction between bisexual and pansexual?”

“Sure,” he answered.

I am pansexual. It was time to say it out loud.

In the comments string on this post, Juliet (f’ing brilliant, by the way) and I have been having a discussion about the nature of the word “pansexuality” as it relates not only to gender but to activity. I like the word for several reasons, I have not touched on them all here, and I suggest that as further reading you explore the comments thread. And go read Juliet’s blog.