39. Take It Up With Him

Today’s post is dedicated to one of the niggling, nagging annoyances of kinky life that I wish to permanently destroy.

Here’s the situation. Maymay and I make a kinky friend or two. Perhaps we’ve chatted at a party. Maybe we meet someone new online, or we find ourselves in touch through an event or meeting. In any case, the lines of communication are open. All parties have access to all relevant email addresses, et cetera.

And then, a day or two later, I will get a sweet, polite email in my inbox. It will usually express how great it was to meet the two of us, and sometimes propose a date for coffee or extend an invitation. All seems well, yes?

Except I’ll go ask Maymay if he’d like to take that date, or act on the invitation we’ve been given, and I’ll be greeted with a blank stare. “I have no idea what you’re talking about,” he’ll say. “I didn’t get that email.”

What has happened? Does the Cc box not work for kinky people? Is Reply All on the fritz?

This has never, ever happened with correspondence to us in a vanilla context. It has happened several times with correspondence in a kinky context. And it is weird, annoying, and occasionally downright inappropriate.

Yes, it’s true that we live together, and we see each other’s emails. It’s true that we read each other’s blog comments and Twitter feeds. It’s true that messages for him will still find their source through me. But I find the method rather nonsensical, especially regarding events and invitations. If you have something to say to Maymay, say it to him. His contact info is so easy to find, you can trip over it.

Why does this happen? Sometimes, I suspect laziness. But frankly, how hard is it to type another email address?

Other times I suspect that although I’m the dominant one, Maymay is the more intimidating. I advise all parties concerned to get over this. He is intimidating, and abrasive. He’s also worth knowing.

And occasionally I do think this is a technical goof. Not everyone is email savvy: forgiven. Once. Email is not like the telephone. Believe it or not, more than two people can participate in an email conversation.

Most commonly, I fear, correspondance that should go to both of us ends up sitting in solitary in my mailbox because kinky people have this persistent, annoying tendancy to assume that because I am dominant, I am also the main point of contact in our relationship’s public face. (And yes, our relationship does have a public face.) This trickles down into all kinds of dangerous assumptions, not the least of which are:

That we’re in a 24/7 D/s dynamic. (Technically I’d argue we are, but we don’t advertise that fact, and we don’t suspend collaborative decision making.)

Or, that dominants make decisions, and submissives take orders. In social contexts, in scene contexts. What’s next? Shall I start ringing my boy at lunch to tell him how much sugar to stir into his coffee? Destroy this terrible, awful assumption before we all make ourselves out as assholes. I’m not our manager.

Or, that I speak for Maymay. Frankly, no. Just no. And I think that when meeting the two of us this should be obvious. But apparently it isn’t.

New acquaintances have no idea what roles Maymay and I play in our relationship even if they do know our dynamic. And really, it should be fairly easy to see that addressing mutually applicable emails only to me implies that you consider Maymay to be an unequal partner in our relationship.

Point the first: Maymay might be an unequal partner in some parts of our private relationship, but he is most definitely my equal counterpart as far as our public face is concerned.

And point the second: Unless we tell you otherwise, to treat the two of us as unequal partners of our own relationship disrespects us. Both of us.

Newsflash: non-consensually disrespecting submissives is still a shitty thing to do.

This behavior is a precise, miniaturized version of attempting to negotiate scenes with Maymay through me. I have said before, and I will say many, many times again: he does his own negotiation. Take it up with him.

Let’s dispense with the assumptions, and bring back the Cc box. I’m sick of playing messenger.

Coochie Snorcher

Did you ever play the penis game when you were growing up? The boys in my high school used to play it in math class, and I remember thinking how weird it was that they’d use a part of themselves as a dirty, funny word.

I will never be a good erotica writer. I get annoyed with the euphemisms, I’m sick of the crashing oceans. I’m fed up with the metaphor, the impossible dance to balance the delicate with the raw. I’ve had terms churning up in my mind for weeks now, full of frustration.

I simply do not like any of the words we have in this language to refer to our genitalia. And you must admit, erotica does generally contain genitalia. It’s the nature of the two-backed beast.

This is what I do with my time. I sit around and try to figure out why I don’t like words.

I’ll start with the obvious. The technical terms, if you will.

Vagina & Penis

The Vagina Monologues really nailed the word “vagina” right on the nose:

“It sounds like an infection at best, maybe a medical instrument: ‘Hurry nurse, bring me the vagina!’”

Seriously, that is one awkward conflux of sounds. The “v” comes humming off the tongue nicely only to be brought up squeaking short by the high-pitched vowels. It’s not a word I’d like to run my tongue over; it actually sounds distasteful. Clinical.

“Penis” isn’t really doing much better. Pee-niss. The onomatopoeia of the word “penis” is not sex; it’s urine. I realize that’s right on the nose for some, but I am not quite happy that one of the most inevitable words in sexual language is screaming piss play in my face. A sterile, yellow fluid for a sterile, yellow word.

Insert and remove the penis from the vagina, ensuring a sufficient amount of lubrication has saturated the area to allow for fluid motion. Repeat until climax.

Yes, that’s definitely how I want to spend my nights.

Our vaginas and penises are pretty much the only body parts we still consistently use euphemisms for. We’ve grown past the tightly buttoned morality of the Victorian era that danced around chicken breasts and table legs, but we’re still in a culture where it’s just not okay to admit to sex out loud. Our sexual organs are swearwords.

And the euphemisms are even worse, which goes against the very definition of what a euphemism is supposed to be.

There are, of course, the obvious choices.

Cock & Pussy

What am I, keeping a farm now?

I really don’t get the word “pussy.” It’s a bit squelchy, in the end. I feel as though this word got picked up to mean “vagina” because no one could think of a better option. I have no ownership of the word. The area between my legs, although hairy and soft, does not seem adequately represented by the word “pussy.” This edges into the nonsensical for me, a combination of baby talk and misplaced modesty.

The word is far more illuminating in its derogatory use: don’t be a pussy. Don’t be a wimp. Don’t be passive. Pussy is a swearword of weakness and impotence. Isn’t that just fantastic; we’ve managed to make the word we use for a women’s genitals simultaneously dirty and weak. I can’t really avoid that when I say the word pussy. It leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

“Cock” is a word that I’m warily all right with. It sounds arrogant and hard and clever. But it is undeniably a bit blunt for some situations. The language forces my hand, the very rhythm of the word like a loud misplaced drumbeat in a quieter symphony. I ran my fingertips gently along his cock.

It’s like a linguistic game: one of these words is not like the others, one of these words is not like its brothers.

Cunt.

Here’s the thing about the word cunt. I actually like it; that’s right, I like it. Its vulgarity and abruptness make it a natural complement for the word “cock.” They sound nice together, an aggressive shoulder-to-shoulder brawling clash of sounds. Cock. Cunt. They are hard, fast sounds, and they work for hard, fast sex.

Cunt. Cock. Fuck. Cunt. Cock. Fuck. Them’s fighting words. Thrusting words.

But “cunt” is also a political word. It holds multiple spaces in my consciousness; a word of female power, a word of reclamation, the word so dirty I didn’t even know it existed because no one dared to use it. A violent word, a feminist word. It is politically charged in ways that my sex is not.

Also, my sex is not always the thrusting rhythm of cunt-cock-fuck sex. This is the battle between technical and vulgar; no matter what words I choose I cannot escape being one or the other, unless I just want to be funny.

So those are my choices: technical, vulgar, or funny. That’s what sex comes down to.

Really, it’s all downhill from here.

Dick.

Horrible sound. “Dick” has all of the shortness of “cock” but none of the flavor. Also, similar to “johnson,” I really cannot get past the fact that this is a name. I don’t name my vagina. I don’t want to name your penis. It’s not a pet, for fuck’s sake.

Organ. (See also: manhood, member.)

What organ? His liver? Am I having a tender tryst with the man’s kidneys?

These words are like having sex through a hole in a bed sheet; distant and full of deniability. Words of coming of age stories and exclusive clubs that I clearly cannot join. In my head these words ring of the historical distaste that made women out as incomplete men. I have organs aplenty, but not the one that counts. My womanhood is innocuous and outdated, and as for membership, well, you get the picture.

Cooch.

No. Just . . . no. I give up on this one. I have no idea how people can stand to even say this out loud. It feels like sandpaper on my tongue.

From here we devolve into the obscure and the outrageous. I cannot create my own euphemisms to use in my erotic writing, precisely because they would be meaningless. Meaningless words are the least sexy of all; they are simply baby talk. Often reading erotica with made-up words makes me feel as though I’ve stumbled into a game of dirty Mad-Libs.

I get that some of us have moved beyond these hang-ups, although clearly I have not. I can talk about almost everything; I spent the beginning of Friday night regaling a complete stranger with my opinions on dildoes. I can talk about sex. And yet I feel hemmed in by these terms: cock, pussy, cunt, penis. I don’t like how they sit on the page. I don’t like that our sexual organs are weighted with such unsexy language.

I mean, coochie snorcher? What the hell?

Protected: Fallacy Crash

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


Until They Become Conscious They Will Never Rebel

All right. Enough sex and happiness, let’s get back to the angst and soul searching. That’s why you’re here, right?

Right? Guys . . . ?

I finished writing this post on Monday, it hung around in my drafts folder, and I figure I’ll toss it out while I’m on hiatus and let ya’ll yell at me a bit. I would like to make it clear that this has nothing to do with why I’m taking a bit of a break. I was serious about that break thing. But, y’know, I already wrote it.

Unfortunately, many good things have been overdone. Not least among them is Ayn Rand. (If you don’t know who Ayn Rand is, then I apologize in advance.) Especially when one comes up and says “Oh, I love Ayn Rand. She changed my life.”

Oh, I don’t like that I’m going to say it, but I’m saying it anyway. I love Ayn Rand. She changed my life.

I read her philosophies, badly disguised as novels, beginning when I was about 15. At the time, I felt like I’d been hit with a lightning bolt. Here was someone who was articulating a theory I’d been thinking my entire life, but couldn’t say out loud.

I’m not going to go into the nuances of the theory from an academic standpoint, because frankly that’s all crap when it comes to how ideas affect one’s life. What I came out of her books with (including a better ability to articulate my thoughts) was this; I am my own judge, jury, and executioner. I determine my worth. I determine the value of my ideas, my work. I set my own standards, and I meet my own goals. I decide how beautiful I am, how smart I am, how worthy I am.

And I had better work my fucking ass off, because I owe it to myself to have good standards. I am my harshest critic, and I do not often cut myself slack.

What people rarely say, after coming to this or similar conclusions, is that living with these ideas in mind is sometimes heart-wrenchingly hard. If, like Maymay now or like me 8 years ago, you live in a world that constantly batters, beats down, marginalizes, or ridicules a portion of you, it is overwhelmingly hard to accept or validate yourself.

Especially when you are 18 years old, 50 pounds overweight and feel like you can’t possibly wake up and be more ugly.

Especially when your every mistake and hesitation brings on ridicule.

Especially when your desires are considered taboo, your demands unholy, your tastes profane and your orientation sick.

Especially when you put yourself out and get nothing back.

From George Orwell’s 1984: Being in a minority, even a minority of one, did not make you mad. There was truth and there was untruth, and if you clung to the truth even against the whole world, you were not mad.

This is approximately how I would feel some nights, realizing that either I was the person I thought I was, or I was going insane.

And eventually I became confident, and spoke out, and felt sexy, and did good work, and had friends and relationships. But then, which came first, the relationships or the confidence?

What I realized eventually was that Rand’s theories are torn to bits within the context of relationships based on respect, or love. In reality, I determine my goals and standards. I am still my own judge and jury. But also in reality, I do like to be validated by those I respect, and love. That’s the proof I wasn’t going insane all those nights ago.

(Rand would yell and scream and say I don’t need that, but I think perhaps my arrogance is more tempered by reality than hers.)

Eileen, what the hell does any of this have to do with kink?

Elizabeth recently put out a meaningless profile on a dating site, and got back over 100 responses in the first few days. I once posted an ad on Craigslist giving my age, sex and orientation, and asking people to write poems for me. I got over 30 poems. At any point, at any time, any woman who wants to can sign onto a chatroom or a message board that fosters female supremacy and be complimented, engaged, or even worshipped.

These are examples of meaningless validation. This is exactly what I’m railing against when I say that you should respect, love, and know your partner. Validation given without respect grounded in reality is meaningless.

And a lot of people sit on the sidelines, watch these exchanges and simply marvel. They don’t understand why or how people can ever feel good about that kind of relationship.

Well, I am not one of those people who sits on the sidelines and marvels. I know exactly how good that kind of validation can feel. I know it because a little part of me, the part that is still aching from the years of hurt and doubt and doesn’t give a fuck how or why as long as the starvation stops, that part of me likes worthless validation.

All the men who want to argue about how we secretly all just love this superiority, blind adoration thing are hungrily leaning in and waiting for me to spill it. Shoo. I am not writing that post. I’m writing the post about how much I hate that a little part of me likes to be adored. Fuck the source, just give me the worship.

(Self awareness doesn’t just mean you analyze your thought processes, you dig into what makes you tick. It means you seek, find, and face down the parts of yourself that you just don’t like.

If you say there are no parts of you that you don’t like, I think you’re a liar.

If you say you have every one of your personality flaws strictly under control, I think you are either a liar, or you’re deluding yourself. I know I am.)

Put a row of people on their knees with their heads bent. You don’t see their faces, and they don’t see yours. The human race has proven time and time again that many of us are capable of worship without understanding. What we haven’t gotten around to admitting yet is that the same capacity may allow us to accept being worshiped without being understood, if we have the strength of self delusion to force our conscience to look the other way.

(Ever wonder why so many smart kinky people are atheists? Think it might be because we’ve got a firsthand knowledge of the dangers of blind faith?)

You will of course be reiterating that this kind of validation is utterly worthless. And that I should know better, and that I do know better. I know this. You don’t have to explain to me all the ways in which these relationships are false, or all the ways in which I do not do what I’m talking about. This is not a post about the hazards, insults and tears brought on by the culture of worthless validation. This is a confessional post. I am not on a soapbox. I am on my knees.

There is a part of me that will forever be convinced that I am dumb, ugly, and sick. This part is hateful, hurt, and has the rational capacities of a two-year-old. It is, I would like to think, firmly under control. But there’s no denying it exists.

And it loves empty flattery, and worthless validation, even while the rest of my mind recoils in horror.(If you say that empty flattery has never once made even a tiny, stupid, childlike part of you happy, I think you’re a liar.)

I don’t want what I could go out and take without conscious thought. But I understand the starvation mode in which any validation is better than none at all.

If within the space of this post I have falsely accused you of lying, my sincere apologies. Instead, I would like to congratulate you.

I congratulate you on living so solidly within a world of principles and rock-solid, confident conclusions. I congratulate you on actualizing good practice and self worth so completely. I congratulate you for doing what I do not.

If I get approached by someone who knows nothing about me beyond the fact that I have ovaries and red hair, and am dominant, and so wants to worship me, almost all of me is squicked beyond all recognition.

But the part of me that is stupid, young, desperate and hurt, and likes to be validated and doesn’t particularly care how or why, the tiny part of me that I don’t like, refuse to listen to, hate to admit to, and undeniably have . . .That part of me smiles.

Eye Of Venus And Onward

The lovely folks over at Eye Of Venus have created a repository of blogs that meet their exacting standards of intelligent, entertaining and literate erotisicm. I was honored (and surprised!) by the invitation, and am in seriously good company. Spin by their site for new reading material. I know my RSS feed isn’t full yet. I hope their hard work pays off grandly.

It seems silly to follow that announcement with this one, but I might not write for a little while. Life is complicated, shit happens, and the New York subway system ate whatever remaining spark of humanity I might have had.

I used to write in my old blog that the mornings after I cry myself to sleep are when I am the most beautiful. My skin stretches out, my eyelids swell and brighten into long cat slits. My eyes are brighter blue. I walk around as though I’m underwater.The marks of our previous nights are written on our faces. We glow from sex, or swim bleary-eyed through draining wine. A knife leaves a red mark on a white cheekbone. Tears leave red marks in our eyes.

I would like to not think for a little while. But I’ll be back. No worries.

Eureka!

I have a theory. Newly discovered. It’s a bit revolutionary, I know, but I think that if you stop and contemplate it with me, just for a little while, you will agree that it is an obvious, necessary endpoint of our biological and cultural origins. Here’s my theory:

All men are bisexual.

Women are the natural aggressor in sexual activity. We’re dominant, horny, think about sex four times a minute. Biology endows us with the ability to devour our partners. (Vagina dentata, no?) Culture confirms and validates us. Men, in their passive roles, devote themselves to attracting us. Seducing us. Worshipping us. Deep seated instinct demands our dominance as a gender. (You know, don’t you, that gender equals power?)

And as sexual aggressors, women are always wanting more. Two mouths on my body are better than one. Four hands on my skin are better than two. We’re devoted to the conquest, the chase, the sating of our pleasure in the most extravagant ways through the mouths and bodies and cocks of our willing prey.

And men are willing. Everything men do, you see, is designed to attract women. As the passive partners in the sexual act they choose to seduce us by making themselves increasingly attractive, offering us everything we desire.

Women live for sexual conquest; as many men as possible, as many possible ways. Devotion to a single partner is laughable for us, unnecessary. We’re independent, self-fulfilled. We support men. Their devotion is unquestioned, and complete.

Any man who tells a woman he’s bisexual is hoping to pick that woman up. We know, of course, that men only say they’re bisexual to get more women. The male-to-male attraction is a pale comparison to the passion and devotion that men feel for women. (Don’t give me this piffle on the definition of “bisexual.” Men love the pussy above all.)

Any man who tells a woman he’s bisexual is offering a threesome with another man. He won’t be particularly picky on who the other man is, because they’ll both be too busy devoting themselves to the woman’s pleasure. His best friend? Sure! His twin brother? Brilliant! Friendships be damned, incest is a lark, as long as the lady’s happy in the end.

Following logically from the above point, all bisexual men are also polyamorous or dedicated to open relationships. Or if not, then they’re just sluts. (And since all men are bisexual, all men are also sluts. Logical, no?)

Gay men are all secretly bisexual, just waiting for the right woman to take them in hand and show them the glory of pussy. We all just love wanking off to the thought of gay men. So sexy! Look at all the pretty men just waiting to be shown the light; they’re like pussy virgins! And god, do we love virgins.

Any man who insists that he’s straight is just shy.

And then, when it comes to sex everybody likes pretty things. Men are by far the more beautiful gender. Just look at all the pretty, pretty, pretty men. So it makes sense that men should be attracted to themselves in a purely sexual sense. It’s a matter of aesthetics.

But of course in the end all bisexual men will eventually choose long term female partners, because although men are pretty, there’s just no denyin’ that women make more valuble partners. We’re the independent ones, after all, earning a living, guiding sexual encounters, making decisions. A man couldn’t function without a woman around to support him. Eventually all bisexual men outgrown their attractions to other men and prefer to devote themselves to a single woman. Only then can they truly be happy, or experience love.

I haven’t thought, really, about women who like other women. I don’t think women can be bisexual, actually. I mean, it seems strange that a woman who could have her pick of the most attractive partners of either gender would choose to sleep with women. Didn’t we just get through saying that men more attractive? And fit logically into the necessary power structure that women deserve in their sexual encounters?

But I guess that women who like other women might secretly think of themselves as men. Then they’d only want women. So I guess all bisexual women are secretly gay. Or degenerates. I don’t really care. I’m not one of those.

As long as men can come out and just embrace that they’re all secretly bisexual, I’ll be a happy girl.

And if you have the contact information for the leaders of any overpopulated, impoverished countries, could you send it along to me? I have a killer recipe for roast baby rump in lemon herb sauce.

You mother fucking assholes.

Protected: Two Things Are Infinite

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below: